From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DD8A6001DA for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:55:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o1N8tLT6028227 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:55:21 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACDE45DE50 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:55:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B206945DE4D for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:55:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EDAE38006 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:55:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.106]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B631DB8037 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:55:20 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:51:26 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [patch 36/36] khugepaged Message-Id: <20100223175126.784aac5e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20100223165807.ade20de6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100221141009.581909647@redhat.com> <20100221141758.658303189@redhat.com> <20100223165807.ade20de6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Adam Litke , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Dave Hansen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , Christoph Lameter , Chris Wright , Andrew Morton , bpicco@redhat.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Balbir Singh , Arnd Bergmann List-ID: On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:58:07 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:10:45 +0100 > > + spin_lock(ptl); > > + isolated = __collapse_huge_page_isolate(vma, address, pte); > > + spin_unlock(ptl); > > Is it safe to take zone->lock under pte_lock and anon_vma->lock ? > > I think usual way is > page = follow_page(FOLL_GET) > isolate_page(page) > I'm sorry it was written in rmap.c as * mapping->i_mmap_lock * anon_vma->lock * mm->page_table_lock or pte_lock * zone->lru_lock (in mark_page_accessed, isolate_lru_page) Regards, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org