Re: [patch 1/3] vmscan: factor out page reference checks

[Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>]

Hello Minchan,

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:38:23PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi, Hannes. 
> 
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:49 +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Moving the big conditional into its own predicate function makes the
> > code a bit easier to read and allows for better commenting on the
> > checks one-by-one.
> > 
> > This is just cleaning up, no semantics should have been changed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > ---
> >  mm/vmscan.c |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index c26986c..c2db55b 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -579,6 +579,37 @@ redo:
> >  	put_page(page);		/* drop ref from isolate */
> >  }
> >  
> > +enum page_references {
> > +	PAGEREF_RECLAIM,
> > +	PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN,
> > +	PAGEREF_ACTIVATE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static enum page_references page_check_references(struct page *page,
> > +						  struct scan_control *sc)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long vm_flags;
> > +	int referenced;
> > +
> > +	referenced = page_referenced(page, 1, sc->mem_cgroup, &vm_flags);
> > +	if (!referenced)
> > +		return PAGEREF_RECLAIM;
> > +
> > +	/* Lumpy reclaim - ignore references */
> > +	if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> > +		return PAGEREF_RECLAIM;
> > +
> > +	/* Mlock lost isolation race - let try_to_unmap() handle it */
> 
> How doest try_to_unamp handle it?
> 
> /* Page which PG_mlocked lost isolation race - let try_to_unmap() move
> the page to unevitable list */
> 
> The point is to move the page into unevictable list in case of race. 
> Let's write down comment more clearly. 
> As it was, it was clear, I think. :)

Okay, I do not feel strongly about it.  I just figured it would be enough
at this point to say 'page is special, pass it on to try_to_unmap(), it
knows how to handle it.  We do not care.'.  But maybe you are right.

I attached an incremental patch below.

> > +	if (vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> > +		return PAGEREF_RECLAIM;
> > +
> > +	if (page_mapping_inuse(page))
> > +		return PAGEREF_ACTIVATE;
> > +
> > +	/* Reclaim if clean, defer dirty pages to writeback */
> > +	return PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * shrink_page_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
> >   */
> > @@ -590,16 +621,15 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> >  	struct pagevec freed_pvec;
> >  	int pgactivate = 0;
> >  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
> > -	unsigned long vm_flags;
> >  
> >  	cond_resched();
> >  
> >  	pagevec_init(&freed_pvec, 1);
> >  	while (!list_empty(page_list)) {
> > +		enum page_references references;
> >  		struct address_space *mapping;
> >  		struct page *page;
> >  		int may_enter_fs;
> > -		int referenced;
> >  
> >  		cond_resched();
> >  
> > @@ -641,17 +671,14 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> >  				goto keep_locked;
> >  		}
> >  
> > -		referenced = page_referenced(page, 1,
> > -						sc->mem_cgroup, &vm_flags);
> > -		/*
> > -		 * In active use or really unfreeable?  Activate it.
> > -		 * If page which have PG_mlocked lost isoltation race,
> > -		 * try_to_unmap moves it to unevictable list
> > -		 */
> > -		if (sc->order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
> > -					referenced && page_mapping_inuse(page)
> > -					&& !(vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
> > +		references = page_check_references(page, sc);
> > +		switch (references) {
> > +		case PAGEREF_ACTIVATE:
> >  			goto activate_locked;
> > +		case PAGEREF_RECLAIM:
> > +		case PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN:
> > +			; /* try to reclaim the page below */
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Anonymous process memory has backing store?
> > @@ -685,7 +712,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		if (PageDirty(page)) {
> > -			if (sc->order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER && referenced)
> > +			if (references == PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN)
> 
> How equal PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN and sc->order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
> && referenced by semantic?

It is encoded in page_check_references().  When
	sc->order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER && referenced
it returns PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN.

So

	- PageDirty() && order < COSTLY && referenced
	+ PageDirty() && references == PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN

is an equivalent transformation.  Does this answer your question?

	Hannes
	
---
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: vmscan: improve comment on mlocked page in reclaim

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 674a78b..819fff7 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -578,7 +578,10 @@ static enum page_references page_check_references(struct page *page,
 	if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
 		return PAGEREF_RECLAIM;
 
-	/* Mlock lost isolation race - let try_to_unmap() handle it */
+	/*
+	 * Mlock lost the isolation race with us.  Let try_to_unmap()
+	 * move the page to the unevictable list.
+	 */
 	if (vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
 		return PAGEREF_RECLAIM;
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>