From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 4/9 v2] oom: remove compulsory panic_on_oom mode
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:13:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100217111319.d342f10e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002161756100.15079@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:58:05 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > Ok, I'll eliminate pagefault_out_of_memory() and get it to use
> > out_of_memory() by only checking for constrained_alloc() when
> > gfp_mask != 0.
> >
>
> What do you think about making pagefaults use out_of_memory() directly and
> respecting the sysctl_panic_on_oom settings?
>
I don't think this patch is good. Because several memcg can
cause oom at the same time independently, system-wide oom locking is
unsuitable. BTW, what I doubt is much more fundamental thing.
What I doubt at most is "why VM_FAULT_OOM is necessary ? or why we have
to call oom_killer when page fault returns it".
Is there someone who returns VM_FAULT_OOM without calling page allocator
and oom-killer helps something in such situation ?
If returning VM_FAULT_OOM without caliing usual page allocator, oom-killer
will be never help, I guess.
If we don't have that, we don't have to implement pagefault_out_of_memory.
Hmm ?
Thanks,
-Kame
> This removes the check for a parallel memcg oom killing since we can
> guarantee that's not going to happen if we take ZONE_OOM_LOCKED for all
> populated zones (nobody is currently executing the oom killer) and no
> tasks have TIF_MEMDIE set.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
> return false;
> }
>
> -extern bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task);
> void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struct page *page, int val);
> unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
> gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> @@ -258,11 +257,6 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> -static inline bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task)
> -{
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> static inline int
> mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> * Should the accounting and control be hierarchical, per subtree?
> */
> bool use_hierarchy;
> - unsigned long last_oom_jiffies;
> atomic_t refcnt;
>
> unsigned int swappiness;
> @@ -1234,34 +1233,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
> return total;
> }
>
> -bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task)
> -{
> - bool ret = false;
> - struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> - struct mm_struct *mm;
> -
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - mm = task->mm;
> - if (!mm)
> - mm = &init_mm;
> - mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
> - if (mem && time_before(jiffies, mem->last_oom_jiffies + HZ/10))
> - ret = true;
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static int record_last_oom_cb(struct mem_cgroup *mem, void *data)
> -{
> - mem->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void record_last_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> -{
> - mem_cgroup_walk_tree(mem, NULL, record_last_oom_cb);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Currently used to update mapped file statistics, but the routine can be
> * generalized to update other statistics as well.
> @@ -1549,10 +1520,8 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
> }
>
> if (!nr_retries--) {
> - if (oom) {
> + if (oom)
> mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask);
> - record_last_oom(mem_over_limit);
> - }
> goto nomem;
> }
> }
> @@ -2408,8 +2377,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>
> /*
> * A call to try to shrink memory usage on charge failure at shmem's swapin.
> - * Calling hierarchical_reclaim is not enough because we should update
> - * last_oom_jiffies to prevent pagefault_out_of_memory from invoking global OOM.
> * Moreover considering hierarchy, we should reclaim from the mem_over_limit,
> * not from the memcg which this page would be charged to.
> * try_charge_swapin does all of these works properly.
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -490,29 +490,6 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> return oom_kill_task(victim);
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> -void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> -{
> - unsigned long points = 0;
> - struct task_struct *p;
> -
> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -retry:
> - p = select_bad_process(&points, mem, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
> - if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
> - goto out;
> -
> - if (!p)
> - p = current;
> -
> - if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, mem,
> - "Memory cgroup out of memory"))
> - goto retry;
> -out:
> - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(oom_notify_list);
>
> int register_oom_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> @@ -578,6 +555,70 @@ void clear_zonelist_oom(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Try to acquire the oom killer lock for all system zones. Returns zero if a
> + * parallel oom killing is taking place, otherwise locks all zones and returns
> + * non-zero.
> + */
> +static int try_set_system_oom(void)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int ret = 1;
> +
> + spin_lock(&zone_scan_lock);
> + for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> + if (zone_is_oom_locked(zone)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> + zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_OOM_LOCKED);
> +out:
> + spin_unlock(&zone_scan_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Clears ZONE_OOM_LOCKED for all system zones so that failed allocation
> + * attempts or page faults may now recall the oom killer, if necessary.
> + */
> +static void clear_system_oom(void)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> +
> + spin_lock(&zone_scan_lock);
> + for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> + zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_OOM_LOCKED);
> + spin_unlock(&zone_scan_lock);
> +}
> +
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> + unsigned long points = 0;
> + struct task_struct *p;
> +
> + if (!try_set_system_oom())
> + return;
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +retry:
> + p = select_bad_process(&points, mem, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
> + if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!p)
> + p = current;
> +
> + if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, mem,
> + "Memory cgroup out of memory"))
> + goto retry;
> +out:
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> + clear_system_oom();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> * Must be called with tasklist_lock held for read.
> */
> static void __out_of_memory(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> @@ -612,46 +653,9 @@ retry:
> goto retry;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * pagefault handler calls into here because it is out of memory but
> - * doesn't know exactly how or why.
> - */
> -void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)
> -{
> - unsigned long freed = 0;
> -
> - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&oom_notify_list, 0, &freed);
> - if (freed > 0)
> - /* Got some memory back in the last second. */
> - return;
> -
> - /*
> - * If this is from memcg, oom-killer is already invoked.
> - * and not worth to go system-wide-oom.
> - */
> - if (mem_cgroup_oom_called(current))
> - goto rest_and_return;
> -
> - if (sysctl_panic_on_oom)
> - panic("out of memory from page fault. panic_on_oom is selected.\n");
> -
> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> - /* unknown gfp_mask and order */
> - __out_of_memory(0, 0, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
> - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> -
> - /*
> - * Give "p" a good chance of killing itself before we
> - * retry to allocate memory.
> - */
> -rest_and_return:
> - if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
> - schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * out_of_memory - kill the "best" process when we run out of memory
> - * @zonelist: zonelist pointer
> + * @zonelist: zonelist pointer passed to page allocator
> * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags
> * @order: amount of memory being requested as a power of 2
> * @nodemask: nodemask passed to page allocator
> @@ -665,7 +669,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> int order, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> unsigned long freed = 0;
> - enum oom_constraint constraint;
> + enum oom_constraint constraint = CONSTRAINT_NONE;
>
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&oom_notify_list, 0, &freed);
> if (freed > 0)
> @@ -681,7 +685,8 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * Check if there were limitations on the allocation (only relevant for
> * NUMA) that may require different handling.
> */
> - constraint = constrained_alloc(zonelist, gfp_mask, nodemask);
> + if (zonelist)
> + constraint = constrained_alloc(zonelist, gfp_mask, nodemask);
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> if (unlikely(sysctl_panic_on_oom)) {
> /*
> @@ -691,6 +696,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> */
> if (constraint == CONSTRAINT_NONE) {
> dump_header(NULL, gfp_mask, order, NULL);
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> panic("Out of memory: panic_on_oom is enabled\n");
> }
> }
> @@ -704,3 +710,17 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * The pagefault handler calls here because it is out of memory, so kill a
> + * memory-hogging task. If a populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a parallel
> + * oom killing is already in progress so do nothing. If a task is found with
> + * TIF_MEMDIE set, it has been killed so do nothing and allow it to exit.
> + */
> +void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)
> +{
> + if (!try_set_system_oom())
> + return;
> + out_of_memory(NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
> + clear_system_oom();
> +}
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-17 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-15 22:19 [patch -mm 0/9 v2] oom killer rewrite David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 1/9 v2] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset David Rientjes
2010-02-16 6:14 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 2/9 v2] oom: sacrifice child with highest badness score for parent David Rientjes
2010-02-16 6:15 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 3/9 v2] oom: select task from tasklist for mempolicy ooms David Rientjes
2010-02-23 6:31 ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-23 8:17 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 4/9 v2] oom: remove compulsory panic_on_oom mode David Rientjes
2010-02-16 0:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 0:14 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 0:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 9:02 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 23:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 23:54 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 0:31 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 0:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 0:54 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 1:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 1:58 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 2:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-02-17 2:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 2:37 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 2:28 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 2:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 2:58 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 3:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 9:11 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 9:52 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-17 22:04 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-22 5:31 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-22 6:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 11:42 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-22 20:59 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-22 23:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 2:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16 6:20 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16 6:59 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 7:20 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16 7:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 8:08 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16 8:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 8:42 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 5/9 v2] oom: badness heuristic rewrite David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 6/9 v2] oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:28 ` Alan Cox
2010-02-15 22:35 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 7/9 v2] oom: replace sysctls with quick mode David Rientjes
2010-02-16 6:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16 8:58 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 8/9 v2] oom: avoid oom killer for lowmem allocations David Rientjes
2010-02-15 23:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 0:10 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 0:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 1:13 ` [patch] mm: add comment about deprecation of __GFP_NOFAIL David Rientjes
2010-02-16 1:26 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 7:03 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 7:23 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16 5:32 ` [patch -mm 8/9 v2] oom: avoid oom killer for lowmem allocations KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16 7:29 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 6:44 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16 7:41 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 7:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16 8:25 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 23:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 0:03 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17 0:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17 0:21 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-23 11:24 ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-23 21:12 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 9/9 v2] oom: remove unnecessary code and cleanup David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100217111319.d342f10e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=l.lunak@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox