linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 4/9 v2] oom: remove compulsory panic_on_oom mode
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:13:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100217111319.d342f10e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002161756100.15079@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:58:05 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, David Rientjes wrote:
> 
> > Ok, I'll eliminate pagefault_out_of_memory() and get it to use 
> > out_of_memory() by only checking for constrained_alloc() when
> > gfp_mask != 0.
> > 
> 
> What do you think about making pagefaults use out_of_memory() directly and 
> respecting the sysctl_panic_on_oom settings?
> 

I don't think this patch is good. Because several memcg can
cause oom at the same time independently, system-wide oom locking is
unsuitable. BTW, what I doubt is much more fundamental thing.

What I doubt at most is "why VM_FAULT_OOM is necessary ? or why we have
to call oom_killer when page fault returns it".
Is there someone who returns VM_FAULT_OOM without calling page allocator
and oom-killer helps something in such situation ?

If returning VM_FAULT_OOM without caliing usual page allocator, oom-killer
will be never help, I guess.

If we don't have that, we don't have to implement pagefault_out_of_memory.

Hmm ?

Thanks,
-Kame


> This removes the check for a parallel memcg oom killing since we can 
> guarantee that's not going to happen if we take ZONE_OOM_LOCKED for all 
> populated zones (nobody is currently executing the oom killer) and no 
> tasks have TIF_MEMDIE set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -extern bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task);
>  void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struct page *page, int val);
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
>  						gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> @@ -258,11 +257,6 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task)
> -{
> -	return false;
> -}
> -
>  static inline int
>  mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>  	 * Should the accounting and control be hierarchical, per subtree?
>  	 */
>  	bool use_hierarchy;
> -	unsigned long	last_oom_jiffies;
>  	atomic_t	refcnt;
>  
>  	unsigned int	swappiness;
> @@ -1234,34 +1233,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
>  	return total;
>  }
>  
> -bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task)
> -{
> -	bool ret = false;
> -	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> -	struct mm_struct *mm;
> -
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	mm = task->mm;
> -	if (!mm)
> -		mm = &init_mm;
> -	mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
> -	if (mem && time_before(jiffies, mem->last_oom_jiffies + HZ/10))
> -		ret = true;
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static int record_last_oom_cb(struct mem_cgroup *mem, void *data)
> -{
> -	mem->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void record_last_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> -{
> -	mem_cgroup_walk_tree(mem, NULL, record_last_oom_cb);
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Currently used to update mapped file statistics, but the routine can be
>   * generalized to update other statistics as well.
> @@ -1549,10 +1520,8 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		}
>  
>  		if (!nr_retries--) {
> -			if (oom) {
> +			if (oom)
>  				mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask);
> -				record_last_oom(mem_over_limit);
> -			}
>  			goto nomem;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -2408,8 +2377,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  
>  /*
>   * A call to try to shrink memory usage on charge failure at shmem's swapin.
> - * Calling hierarchical_reclaim is not enough because we should update
> - * last_oom_jiffies to prevent pagefault_out_of_memory from invoking global OOM.
>   * Moreover considering hierarchy, we should reclaim from the mem_over_limit,
>   * not from the memcg which this page would be charged to.
>   * try_charge_swapin does all of these works properly.
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -490,29 +490,6 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
>  	return oom_kill_task(victim);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> -void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> -{
> -	unsigned long points = 0;
> -	struct task_struct *p;
> -
> -	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -retry:
> -	p = select_bad_process(&points, mem, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
> -	if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	if (!p)
> -		p = current;
> -
> -	if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, mem,
> -				"Memory cgroup out of memory"))
> -		goto retry;
> -out:
> -	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(oom_notify_list);
>  
>  int register_oom_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> @@ -578,6 +555,70 @@ void clear_zonelist_oom(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * Try to acquire the oom killer lock for all system zones.  Returns zero if a
> + * parallel oom killing is taking place, otherwise locks all zones and returns
> + * non-zero.
> + */
> +static int try_set_system_oom(void)
> +{
> +	struct zone *zone;
> +	int ret = 1;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&zone_scan_lock);
> +	for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> +		if (zone_is_oom_locked(zone)) {
> +			ret = 0;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> +		zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_OOM_LOCKED);
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock(&zone_scan_lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Clears ZONE_OOM_LOCKED for all system zones so that failed allocation
> + * attempts or page faults may now recall the oom killer, if necessary.
> + */
> +static void clear_system_oom(void)
> +{
> +	struct zone *zone;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&zone_scan_lock);
> +	for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> +		zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_OOM_LOCKED);
> +	spin_unlock(&zone_scan_lock);
> +}
> +
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> +	unsigned long points = 0;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
> +
> +	if (!try_set_system_oom())
> +		return;
> +	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +retry:
> +	p = select_bad_process(&points, mem, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
> +	if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (!p)
> +		p = current;
> +
> +	if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, mem,
> +				"Memory cgroup out of memory"))
> +		goto retry;
> +out:
> +	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	clear_system_oom();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
>   * Must be called with tasklist_lock held for read.
>   */
>  static void __out_of_memory(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> @@ -612,46 +653,9 @@ retry:
>  		goto retry;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * pagefault handler calls into here because it is out of memory but
> - * doesn't know exactly how or why.
> - */
> -void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)
> -{
> -	unsigned long freed = 0;
> -
> -	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&oom_notify_list, 0, &freed);
> -	if (freed > 0)
> -		/* Got some memory back in the last second. */
> -		return;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If this is from memcg, oom-killer is already invoked.
> -	 * and not worth to go system-wide-oom.
> -	 */
> -	if (mem_cgroup_oom_called(current))
> -		goto rest_and_return;
> -
> -	if (sysctl_panic_on_oom)
> -		panic("out of memory from page fault. panic_on_oom is selected.\n");
> -
> -	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -	/* unknown gfp_mask and order */
> -	__out_of_memory(0, 0, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
> -	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Give "p" a good chance of killing itself before we
> -	 * retry to allocate memory.
> -	 */
> -rest_and_return:
> -	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
> -		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * out_of_memory - kill the "best" process when we run out of memory
> - * @zonelist: zonelist pointer
> + * @zonelist: zonelist pointer passed to page allocator
>   * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags
>   * @order: amount of memory being requested as a power of 2
>   * @nodemask: nodemask passed to page allocator
> @@ -665,7 +669,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		int order, nodemask_t *nodemask)
>  {
>  	unsigned long freed = 0;
> -	enum oom_constraint constraint;
> +	enum oom_constraint constraint = CONSTRAINT_NONE;
>  
>  	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&oom_notify_list, 0, &freed);
>  	if (freed > 0)
> @@ -681,7 +685,8 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	 * Check if there were limitations on the allocation (only relevant for
>  	 * NUMA) that may require different handling.
>  	 */
> -	constraint = constrained_alloc(zonelist, gfp_mask, nodemask);
> +	if (zonelist)
> +		constraint = constrained_alloc(zonelist, gfp_mask, nodemask);
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	if (unlikely(sysctl_panic_on_oom)) {
>  		/*
> @@ -691,6 +696,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		 */
>  		if (constraint == CONSTRAINT_NONE) {
>  			dump_header(NULL, gfp_mask, order, NULL);
> +			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>  			panic("Out of memory: panic_on_oom is enabled\n");
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -704,3 +710,17 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
>  		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * The pagefault handler calls here because it is out of memory, so kill a
> + * memory-hogging task.  If a populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a parallel
> + * oom killing is already in progress so do nothing.  If a task is found with
> + * TIF_MEMDIE set, it has been killed so do nothing and allow it to exit.
> + */
> +void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)
> +{
> +	if (!try_set_system_oom())
> +		return;
> +	out_of_memory(NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
> +	clear_system_oom();
> +}
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-17  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-15 22:19 [patch -mm 0/9 v2] oom killer rewrite David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 1/9 v2] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset David Rientjes
2010-02-16  6:14   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 2/9 v2] oom: sacrifice child with highest badness score for parent David Rientjes
2010-02-16  6:15   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 3/9 v2] oom: select task from tasklist for mempolicy ooms David Rientjes
2010-02-23  6:31   ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-23  8:17     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 4/9 v2] oom: remove compulsory panic_on_oom mode David Rientjes
2010-02-16  0:00   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  0:14     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  0:23       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  9:02         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 23:42           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 23:54             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  0:01               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  0:31                 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  0:41                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  0:54                     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  1:03                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  1:58                       ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  2:13                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-02-17  2:23                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  2:37                             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  2:28                           ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  2:34                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  2:58                               ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  3:21                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  9:11                                   ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  9:52                                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-17 22:04                                       ` David Rientjes
2010-02-22  5:31                               ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-22  6:15                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 11:42                                   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-22 20:59                                     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-22 23:51                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 20:55                                   ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  2:19                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16  6:20   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  6:59     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  7:20       ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  7:53         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  8:08           ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  8:10             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  8:42             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 5/9 v2] oom: badness heuristic rewrite David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 6/9 v2] oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:28   ` Alan Cox
2010-02-15 22:35     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 7/9 v2] oom: replace sysctls with quick mode David Rientjes
2010-02-16  6:28   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  8:58     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 8/9 v2] oom: avoid oom killer for lowmem allocations David Rientjes
2010-02-15 23:57   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  0:10     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  0:21       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  1:13         ` [patch] mm: add comment about deprecation of __GFP_NOFAIL David Rientjes
2010-02-16  1:26           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  7:03             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  7:23               ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  5:32       ` [patch -mm 8/9 v2] oom: avoid oom killer for lowmem allocations KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16  7:29         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  6:44       ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  7:41         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  7:53           ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  8:25             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 23:48               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  0:03                 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  0:03                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  0:21                     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-23 11:24                       ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-23 21:12                         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 9/9 v2] oom: remove unnecessary code and cleanup David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100217111319.d342f10e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=l.lunak@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox