linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: share event counter rather than duplicate
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:40:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100212164018.092e1688.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100212154857.f9d8f28e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:48:57 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Memcg has 2 eventcountes which counts "the same" event. Just usages are
> different from each other. This patch tries to reduce event counter.
> 
> This patch's logic uses "only increment, no reset" new_counter and masks for each
> checks. Softlimit chesk was done per 1000 events. So, the similar check
> can be done by !(new_counter & 0x3ff). Threshold check was done per 100
> events. So, the similar check can be done by (!new_counter & 0x7f)
> 
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |   36 ++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: mmotm-2.6.33-Feb10/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.33-Feb10.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.33-Feb10/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ static int really_do_swap_account __init
>  #define do_swap_account		(0)
>  #endif
>  
> -#define SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH (1000)
> -#define THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH (100)
> +#define SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH (0x3ff) /* once in 1024 */
> +#define THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH (0x7f) /* once in 128 */
>  
>  /*
>   * Statistics for memory cgroup.
> @@ -79,10 +79,7 @@ enum mem_cgroup_stat_index {
>  	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGIN_COUNT,	/* # of pages paged in */
>  	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGOUT_COUNT,	/* # of pages paged out */
>  	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAPOUT, /* # of pages, swapped out */
> -	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SOFTLIMIT, /* decrements on each page in/out.
> -					used by soft limit implementation */
> -	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_THRESHOLDS, /* decrements on each page in/out.
> -					used by threshold implementation */
> +	MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS,	/* incremented by 1 at pagein/pageout */
>  
>  	MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS,
>  };
> @@ -394,16 +391,12 @@ mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cg
>  
>  static bool mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
>  {
> -	bool ret = false;
>  	s64 val;
>  
> -	val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SOFTLIMIT]);
> -	if (unlikely(val < 0)) {
> -		this_cpu_write(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SOFTLIMIT],
> -				SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH);
> -		ret = true;
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> +	val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS]);
> +	if (unlikely(!(val & SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH)))
> +		return true;
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
>  static void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
> @@ -542,8 +535,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_charge_statistics
>  		__this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGIN_COUNT]);
>  	else
>  		__this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGOUT_COUNT]);
> -	__this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SOFTLIMIT]);
> -	__this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_THRESHOLDS]);
> +	__this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS]);
>
I think using __this_cpu_inc() would be more natural(and the patch description
says "increment" :)).

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

>  	preempt_enable();
>  }
> @@ -3211,16 +3203,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_swappiness_write(s
>  
>  static bool mem_cgroup_threshold_check(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
>  {
> -	bool ret = false;
>  	s64 val;
>  
> -	val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_THRESHOLDS]);
> -	if (unlikely(val < 0)) {
> -		this_cpu_write(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_THRESHOLDS],
> -				THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH);
> -		ret = true;
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> +	val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS]);
> +	if (unlikely(!(val & THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH)))
> +		return true;
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
>  static void __mem_cgroup_threshold(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swap)
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-12  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-12  6:44 [PATCH 0/2] memcg patches around event counting...softlimit and thresholds KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  6:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg : update softlimit and threshold at commit KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  7:33   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-12  7:42     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  6:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: share event counter rather than duplicate KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  7:40   ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2010-02-12  7:41     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  7:46   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2010-02-12  7:46     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  8:07   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2010-02-12  8:19     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  8:49       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2010-02-12  8:51         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] memcg patches around event counting...softlimit and thresholds v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  9:06   ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: update threshold and softlimit at commit v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12  9:09   ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg : share event counter rather than duplicate v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 11:48     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-15  0:19       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-09 23:15         ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-15 10:57     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2010-02-16  0:16       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100212164018.092e1688.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox