From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E773C600473 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:12:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o0J0CmmZ011076 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:12:48 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4121745DE52 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:12:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD7545DE50 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:12:45 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C288E38001 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:12:45 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.103]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0847B1DB803C for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:12:45 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag In-Reply-To: <20100118151405.GD14345@redhat.com> References: <1263827194.4283.609.camel@laptop> <20100118151405.GD14345@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20100119091004.5F28.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:12:44 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Gleb Natapov Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Peter Zijlstra , Alan Cox , Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andrew.c.morrow@gmail.com, "Paul E. McKenney" List-ID: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 17:01 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > There are valid uses for mlockall() > > > > That's debatable. > > > Well, I have use for it. You can look at previous thread were I described > it and suggest alternatives. Please stop suck. This is the reviewing. The reviewers shouldn't need to look at all previous thread. It mean your description isn't enough. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org