linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH] mm: Restore zone->all_unreclaimable to independence word
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:14:10 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100114161311.673B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001132229250.15428@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > commit e815af95 (change all_unreclaimable zone member to flags) chage
> > all_unreclaimable member to bit flag. but It have undesireble side
> > effect.
> > free_one_page() is one of most hot path in linux kernel and increasing
> > atomic ops in it can reduce kernel performance a bit.
> > 
> > Thus, this patch revert such commit partially. at least
> > all_unreclaimable shouldn't share memory word with other zone flags.
> > 
> 
> I still think you need to quantify this; saying you don't have a large 
> enough of a machine that will benefit from it isn't really a rationale for 
> the lack of any data supporting your claim.  We should be basing VM 
> changes on data, not on speculation that there's a measurable impact 
> here.
> 
> Perhaps you could ask a colleague or another hacker to run a benchmark for 
> you so that the changelog is complete?

ok, fair. although I dislike current unnecessary atomic-ops.
I'll pending this patch until get good data.

thanks.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-14  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-14  1:35 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-14  6:33 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-14  7:14   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-01-14  8:32     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-14 23:19       ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-15  2:30         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-15  4:47           ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100114161311.673B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox