From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 -mmotm-2010-01-06-14-34] check high watermark after shrink zone
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:48:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100111084816.81bc7ebd.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> (raw)
* V2
* Add reviewed-by singed-off (Thanks Kosaki, Wu)
* Fix typo of changelog
== CUT HERE ==
Kswapd check that zone have enough free by zone_water_mark.
If any zone doesn't have enough page, it set all_zones_ok to zero.
!all_zone_ok makes kswapd retry not sleeping.
I think the watermark check before shrink zone is pointless.
Kswapd try to shrink zone then the check is meaninful.
This patch move the check after shrink zone.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
CC: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
CC: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 885207a..b81adf8 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2057,9 +2057,6 @@ loop_again:
priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
continue;
- if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
- high_wmark_pages(zone), end_zone, 0))
- all_zones_ok = 0;
temp_priority[i] = priority;
sc.nr_scanned = 0;
note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
@@ -2099,13 +2096,17 @@ loop_again:
total_scanned > sc.nr_reclaimed + sc.nr_reclaimed / 2)
sc.may_writepage = 1;
- /*
- * We are still under min water mark. it mean we have
- * GFP_ATOMIC allocation failure risk. Hurry up!
- */
- if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, min_wmark_pages(zone),
- end_zone, 0))
- has_under_min_watermark_zone = 1;
+ if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
+ high_wmark_pages(zone), end_zone, 0)) {
+ all_zones_ok = 0;
+ /*
+ * We are still under min water mark. it mean we have
+ * GFP_ATOMIC allocation failure risk. Hurry up!
+ */
+ if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, min_wmark_pages(zone),
+ end_zone, 0))
+ has_under_min_watermark_zone = 1;
+ }
}
if (all_zones_ok)
--
1.5.6.3
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-10 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 23:48 Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-01-11 3:46 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100111084816.81bc7ebd.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox