From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C5560021B for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:34:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by e28smtp08.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nBT75An1027284 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:35:10 +0530 Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (d28av03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.65]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nBT7YF123277014 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:04:15 +0530 Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av03.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nBT7YFRw011808 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:34:15 +1100 Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:04:12 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] vmscan: get_scan_ratio cleanup Message-ID: <20091229073412.GN3601@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20091228164451.A687.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091228164733.A68A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091228164733.A68A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: * KOSAKI Motohiro [2009-12-28 16:48:06]: > The get_scan_ratio() should have all scan-ratio related calculations. > Thus, this patch move some calculation into get_scan_ratio. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 2bbee91..640486b 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -1501,6 +1501,13 @@ static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, > unsigned long ap, fp; > struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc); > > + /* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */ > + if (!sc->may_swap || (nr_swap_pages <= 0)) { > + percent[0] = 0; > + percent[1] = 100; > + return; > + } > + > anon = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON) + > zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON); > file = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE) + > @@ -1598,22 +1605,20 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, > unsigned long nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed; > unsigned long nr_to_reclaim = sc->nr_to_reclaim; > struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc); > - int noswap = 0; > > - /* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */ > - if (!sc->may_swap || (nr_swap_pages <= 0)) { > - noswap = 1; > - percent[0] = 0; > - percent[1] = 100; > - } else > - get_scan_ratio(zone, sc, percent); > + get_scan_ratio(zone, sc, percent); Where do we set noswap? Is percent[0] == 0 used to indicate noswap = 1? > > for_each_evictable_lru(l) { > int file = is_file_lru(l); > unsigned long scan; > > + if (percent[file] == 0) { > + nr[l] = 0; > + continue; > + } > + Is this really needed? Won't nr_scan_try_batch handle it correctly? > scan = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, l); > - if (priority || noswap) { > + if (priority) { > scan >>= priority; > scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100; > } -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org