From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08C026B0044 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:29:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.75]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id nBL0TjNw021967 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:29:45 +0900 Received: from smail (m5 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E016E45DE3E for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:29:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.95]) by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A8645DE52 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:29:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC501DB803F for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:29:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from m107.s.css.fujitsu.com (m107.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.107]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C076D1DB8038 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:29:43 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:26:25 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 28 of 28] memcg huge memory Message-Id: <20091221092625.4aef2c3a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20091220183943.GA6429@random.random> References: <20091218103312.2f61bbfc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091218160437.GP29790@random.random> <20091220183943.GA6429@random.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Adam Litke , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , Christoph Lameter , Chris Wright , Andrew Morton , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" List-ID: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:39:43 +0100 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 08:06:50AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > My intentsion was adding a patch for adding "pagesize" parameters > > to charge/uncharge function may be able to reduce size of changes. > > There's no need for that as my patch shows and I doubt it makes a lot > of difference at runtime, but it's up to you, I'm neutral. I suggest > is that you send me a patch and I integrate and use your version > ;). I'll take care of adapting huge_memory.c myself if you want to add > the size param to the outer call. > Added CC: to Nishimura. Andrea, Please go ahead as you like. My only concern is a confliction with Nishimura's work. He's preparing a patch for "task move", which has been requested since the start of memcg. He've done really good jobs and enough tests in these 2 months. So, what I think now is to merge Nishimura's to mmotm first and import your patches on it if Nishimura-san can post ready-to-merge version in this year. Nishimura-san, what do you think ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org