linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Question about pte_offset_map_lock
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:46:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091217114630.d353907a.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> (raw)

It may be a dumb question.

As I read the code of pte_lock, I have a question. 
Now, there is pte_offset_map_lock following as. 

#define pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp)     \
({                                                      \
        spinlock_t *__ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);       \
        pte_t *__pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);    \
        *(ptlp) = __ptl;                                \
        spin_lock(__ptl);                               \
        __pte;                                          \
})

Why do we grab the lock after getting __pte?
Is it possible that __pte might be changed before we grab the spin_lock?

Some codes in mm checks original pte by pte_same. 
There are not-checked cases in proc. As looking over the cases,
It seems no problem. But in future, new user of pte_offset_map_lock 
could mistake with that?

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-17  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-17  2:46 Minchan Kim [this message]
2009-12-17  8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 14:49   ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-17  9:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-12-17 15:02   ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091217114630.d353907a.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox