From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Dan Malek <dan@embeddedalley.com>,
Vladislav Buzov <vbuzov@embeddedalley.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] cgroup: implement eventfd-based generic API for notifications
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:35:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091215183533.1a1e87d9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc557aab0912150111k41517b41t8999568db3bd8daa@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:11:16 +0200
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> Could anybody review the patch?
>
> Thank you.
some nitpicks.
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> > + A A A /*
> > + A A A A * Unregister events and notify userspace.
> > + A A A A * FIXME: How to avoid race with cgroup_event_remove_work()
> > + A A A A * A A A A which runs from workqueue?
> > + A A A A */
> > + A A A mutex_lock(&cgrp->event_list_mutex);
> > + A A A list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &cgrp->event_list, list) {
> > + A A A A A A A cgroup_event_remove(event);
> > + A A A A A A A eventfd_signal(event->eventfd, 1);
> > + A A A }
> > + A A A mutex_unlock(&cgrp->event_list_mutex);
> > +
> > +out:
> > A A A A return ret;
> > A }
How ciritical is this FIXME ?
But Hmm..can't we use RCU ?
> >
> > @@ -1136,6 +1187,8 @@ static void init_cgroup_housekeeping(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> > A A A A INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cgrp->release_list);
> > A A A A INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cgrp->pidlists);
> > A A A A mutex_init(&cgrp->pidlist_mutex);
> > + A A A INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cgrp->event_list);
> > + A A A mutex_init(&cgrp->event_list_mutex);
> > A }
> >
> > A static void init_cgroup_root(struct cgroupfs_root *root)
> > @@ -1935,6 +1988,16 @@ static const struct inode_operations cgroup_dir_inode_operations = {
> > A A A A .rename = cgroup_rename,
> > A };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Check if a file is a control file
> > + */
> > +static inline struct cftype *__file_cft(struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + A A A if (file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_fop != &cgroup_file_operations)
> > + A A A A A A A return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > + A A A return __d_cft(file->f_dentry);
> > +}
> > +
> > A static int cgroup_create_file(struct dentry *dentry, mode_t mode,
> > A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A struct super_block *sb)
> > A {
> > @@ -2789,6 +2852,151 @@ static int cgroup_write_notify_on_release(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> > A A A A return 0;
> > A }
> >
> > +static inline void cgroup_event_remove(struct cgroup_event *event)
> > +{
> > + A A A struct cgroup *cgrp = event->cgrp;
> > +
> > + A A A BUG_ON(event->cft->unregister_event(cgrp, event->cft, event->eventfd));
Hmm ? BUG ? If bug, please add document or comment.
> > + A A A eventfd_ctx_put(event->eventfd);
> > + A A A remove_wait_queue(event->wqh, &event->wait);
> > + A A A list_del(&event->list);
please add comment as /* event_list_mutex must be held */
> > + A A A kfree(event);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void cgroup_event_remove_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + A A A struct cgroup_event *event = container_of(work, struct cgroup_event,
> > + A A A A A A A A A A A remove);
> > + A A A struct cgroup *cgrp = event->cgrp;
> > +
> > + A A A mutex_lock(&cgrp->event_list_mutex);
> > + A A A cgroup_event_remove(event);
> > + A A A mutex_unlock(&cgrp->event_list_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cgroup_event_wake(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode,
> > + A A A A A A A int sync, void *key)
> > +{
> > + A A A struct cgroup_event *event = container_of(wait,
> > + A A A A A A A A A A A struct cgroup_event, wait);
> > + A A A unsigned long flags = (unsigned long)key;
> > +
> > + A A A if (flags & POLLHUP)
> > + A A A A A A A /*
> > + A A A A A A A A * This function called with spinlock taken, but
> > + A A A A A A A A * cgroup_event_remove() may sleep, so we have
> > + A A A A A A A A * to run it in a workqueue.
> > + A A A A A A A A */
> > + A A A A A A A schedule_work(&event->remove);
> > +
> > + A A A return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void cgroup_event_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file,
> > + A A A A A A A wait_queue_head_t *wqh, poll_table *pt)
> > +{
> > + A A A struct cgroup_event *event = container_of(pt,
> > + A A A A A A A A A A A struct cgroup_event, pt);
> > +
> > + A A A event->wqh = wqh;
> > + A A A add_wait_queue(wqh, &event->wait);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cgroup_write_event_control(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> > + A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A const char *buffer)
> > +{
> > + A A A struct cgroup_event *event = NULL;
> > + A A A unsigned int efd, cfd;
> > + A A A struct file *efile = NULL;
> > + A A A struct file *cfile = NULL;
> > + A A A char *endp;
> > + A A A int ret;
> > +
> > + A A A efd = simple_strtoul(buffer, &endp, 10);
> > + A A A if (*endp != ' ')
> > + A A A A A A A return -EINVAL;
> > + A A A buffer = endp + 1;
> > +
> > + A A A cfd = simple_strtoul(buffer, &endp, 10);
> > + A A A if ((*endp != ' ') && (*endp != '\0'))
> > + A A A A A A A return -EINVAL;
> > + A A A buffer = endp + 1;
> > +
> > + A A A event = kzalloc(sizeof(*event), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + A A A if (!event)
> > + A A A A A A A return -ENOMEM;
> > + A A A event->cgrp = cont;
> > + A A A INIT_LIST_HEAD(&event->list);
> > + A A A init_poll_funcptr(&event->pt, cgroup_event_ptable_queue_proc);
> > + A A A init_waitqueue_func_entry(&event->wait, cgroup_event_wake);
> > + A A A INIT_WORK(&event->remove, cgroup_event_remove_work);
> > +
> > + A A A efile = eventfd_fget(efd);
> > + A A A if (IS_ERR(efile)) {
> > + A A A A A A A ret = PTR_ERR(efile);
> > + A A A A A A A goto fail;
> > + A A A }
> > +
> > + A A A event->eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fileget(efile);
> > + A A A if (IS_ERR(event->eventfd)) {
> > + A A A A A A A ret = PTR_ERR(event->eventfd);
> > + A A A A A A A goto fail;
> > + A A A }
> > +
> > + A A A cfile = fget(cfd);
> > + A A A if (!cfile) {
> > + A A A A A A A ret = -EBADF;
> > + A A A A A A A goto fail;
> > + A A A }
> > +
> > + A A A /* the process need read permission on control file */
> > + A A A ret = file_permission(cfile, MAY_READ);
> > + A A A if (ret < 0)
> > + A A A A A A A goto fail;
> > +
> > + A A A event->cft = __file_cft(cfile);
> > + A A A if (IS_ERR(event->cft)) {
> > + A A A A A A A ret = PTR_ERR(event->cft);
> > + A A A A A A A goto fail;
> > + A A A }
> > +
> > + A A A if (!event->cft->register_event || !event->cft->unregister_event) {
> > + A A A A A A A ret = -EINVAL;
> > + A A A A A A A goto fail;
> > + A A A }
> > +
> > + A A A ret = event->cft->register_event(cont, event->cft,
> > + A A A A A A A A A A A event->eventfd, buffer);
> > + A A A if (ret)
> > + A A A A A A A goto fail;
> > +
> > + A A A efile->f_op->poll(efile, &event->pt);
Not necessary to check return value ?
Thanks,
-Kame
> > +
> > + A A A mutex_lock(&cont->event_list_mutex);
> > + A A A list_add(&event->list, &cont->event_list);
> > + A A A mutex_unlock(&cont->event_list_mutex);
> > +
> > + A A A fput(cfile);
> > + A A A fput(efile);
> > +
> > + A A A return 0;
> > +
> > +fail:
> > + A A A if (!IS_ERR(cfile))
> > + A A A A A A A fput(cfile);
> > +
> > + A A A if (event && event->eventfd && !IS_ERR(event->eventfd))
> > + A A A A A A A eventfd_ctx_put(event->eventfd);
> > +
> > + A A A if (!IS_ERR(efile))
> > + A A A A A A A fput(efile);
> > +
> > + A A A if (event)
> > + A A A A A A A kfree(event);
> > +
> > + A A A return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > A /*
> > A * for the common functions, 'private' gives the type of file
> > A */
> > @@ -2814,6 +3022,11 @@ static struct cftype files[] = {
> > A A A A A A A A .read_u64 = cgroup_read_notify_on_release,
> > A A A A A A A A .write_u64 = cgroup_write_notify_on_release,
> > A A A A },
> > + A A A {
> > + A A A A A A A .name = CGROUP_FILE_GENERIC_PREFIX "event_control",
> > + A A A A A A A .write_string = cgroup_write_event_control,
> > + A A A A A A A .mode = S_IWUGO,
> > + A A A },
> > A };
> >
> > A static struct cftype cft_release_agent = {
> > --
> > 1.6.5.3
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-11 22:59 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] cgroup notifications API and memory thresholds Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-11 22:59 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] cgroup: implement eventfd-based generic API for notifications Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-11 22:59 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] memcg: extract mem_group_usage() from mem_cgroup_read() Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-11 22:59 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] memcg: rework usage of stats by soft limit Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-11 22:59 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] memcg: implement memory thresholds Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-12 3:19 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-12 13:11 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-12 13:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-15 1:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15 10:46 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-15 11:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-12 3:50 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] memcg: rework usage of stats by soft limit Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-12 13:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-12 14:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-12 19:46 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-13 1:30 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-15 1:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15 7:48 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-15 8:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-16 8:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] memcg: extract mem_group_usage() from mem_cgroup_read() Balbir Singh
2009-12-15 9:11 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] cgroup: implement eventfd-based generic API for notifications Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-15 9:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-12-15 10:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-15 15:03 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2009-12-15 23:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-16 1:44 ` Li Zefan
2009-12-16 2:00 ` Li Zefan
2009-12-16 5:46 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091215183533.1a1e87d9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan@embeddedalley.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=vbuzov@embeddedalley.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox