linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v4.2
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:09:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091215140913.e28f7674.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0912142054520.436@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:57:53 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 
> > > That's not at all what I said.  I said using total_vm as a baseline allows 
> > > users to define when a process is to be considered "rogue," that is, using 
> > > more memory than expected.  Using rss would be inappropriate since it is 
> > > highly dynamic and depends on the state of the VM at the time of oom, 
> > > which userspace cannot possibly keep updated.
> > > 
> > > You consistently ignore that point: the power of /proc/pid/oom_adj to 
> > > influence when a process, such as a memory leaker, is to be considered as 
> > > a high priority for an oom kill.  It has absolutely nothing to do with 
> > > fake NUMA, cpusets, or memcg.
> > > 
> > You also ignore that it's not sane to use oom kill for resource control ;)
> > 
> 
> Please read my email.  Did I say anything about resource control AT ALL?  
> I said /proc/pid/oom_adj currently allows userspace to define when a task 
> is "rogue," meaning its consuming much more memory than expected.  Those 
> memory leakers should always be the optimal result for the oom killer to 
> kill.  Using rss as the baseline would not allow userspace to effectively 
> do the same thing since it's dynamic and depends on the state of the VM at 
> the time of oom which is probably not reflected in the /proc/pid/oom_adj 
> values for all tasks.  It has absolutely nothing to do with resource 
> control, so please address this very trivial issue without going off on 
> tangents.  Thanks.

What I can't undestand is the technique to know whether a (unknown) process is
leaking memory or not by checking vm_size.
And, why don't you use overcommit_memory when you can depends on vm_size ?

Thanks,
-Kame


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-04  8:09 [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  0:02 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10  7:24   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-10  7:24     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10  7:39       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-10  7:40         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10  8:03           ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-10  8:17             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11  2:24               ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11  2:36                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-11  2:49                 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11  3:02                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-11  3:10                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11  3:14                     ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11  3:23                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-11  3:27                         ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11  3:04                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11  4:45                 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v4 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11  5:28                   ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v4.1 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11  5:58                     ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11  6:20                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11  6:26                         ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11  6:34                           ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v4.2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11  7:32                             ` David Rientjes
2009-11-18  0:11                             ` David Rientjes
2009-11-18  0:58                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-18  2:13                                 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15  1:16                                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-15  1:32                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15  1:38                                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15  4:30                                       ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15  4:35                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15  4:54                                           ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15  5:19                                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-17 22:21                                               ` David Rientjes
2009-12-18  4:30                                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-18 10:04                                                   ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15  4:57                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15  4:43                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15  4:57                                           ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15  5:09                                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-12-17 22:23                                               ` David Rientjes
2009-12-17 23:33                                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15  4:47                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15  5:03                                           ` David Rientjes
2009-11-18  1:41                               ` Daisuke Nishimura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091215140913.e28f7674.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox