Re: [PATCH] vmscan: limit concurrent reclaimers in shrink_zone

[Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:23:19AM -0500, Larry Woodman wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 14:08 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> writes:
> > 
> > > +max_zone_concurrent_reclaim:
> > > +
> > > +The number of processes that are allowed to simultaneously reclaim
> > > +memory from a particular memory zone.
> > > +
> > > +With certain workloads, hundreds of processes end up in the page
> > > +reclaim code simultaneously.  This can cause large slowdowns due
> > > +to lock contention, freeing of way too much memory and occasionally
> > > +false OOM kills.
> > > +
> > > +To avoid these problems, only allow a smaller number of processes
> > > +to reclaim pages from each memory zone simultaneously.
> > > +
> > > +The default value is 8.
> > 
> > I don't like the hardcoded number. Is the same number good for a 128MB
> > embedded system as for as 1TB server?  Seems doubtful.
> > 
> > This should be perhaps scaled with memory size and number of CPUs?
> 
> Remember this a per-zone number.

A zone could be 64MB or 32GB. And the system could have 1 or 1024 CPUs.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>