linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	cl@linux-foundation.org,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	minchan.kim@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC mm][PATCH 2/5] percpu cached mm counter
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:54:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091210075454.GB25549@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091210163448.338a0bd2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>


* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Now, mm's counter information is updated by atomic_long_xxx() 
> functions if USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS is defined. This causes cache-miss when 
> page faults happens simultaneously in prural cpus. (Almost all 
> process-shared objects is...)
> 
> Considering accounting per-mm page usage more, one of problems is cost 
> of this counter.

I'd really like these kinds of stats available via the tool you used to 
develop this patchset:

>  After:
>     Performance counter stats for './multi-fault 2' (5 runs):
> 
>        46997471  page-faults                ( +-   0.720% )
>      1004100076  cache-references           ( +-   0.734% )
>       180959964  cache-misses               ( +-   0.374% )
>    29263437363580464  bus-cycles                 ( +-   0.002% )
> 
>    60.003315683  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.004% )
> 
>    cachemiss/page faults is reduced from 4.55 miss/faults to be 3.85miss/faults

I.e. why not expose these stats via perf events and counts as well, 
beyond the current (rather minimal) set of MM stats perf supports 
currently?

That way we'd get a _lot_ of interesting per task mm stats available via 
perf stat (and maybe they can be profiled as well via perf record), and 
we could perhaps avoid uglies like having to hack hooks into sched.c:

> +	/*
> +	 * sync/invaldidate per-cpu cached mm related information
> +	 * before taling rq->lock. (see include/linux/mm.h)

(minor typo: s/taling/taking )

> +	 */
> +	sync_mm_counters_atomic();
>  
>  	spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
>  	update_rq_clock(rq);

It's not a simple task i guess since this per mm counting business has 
grown its own variant which takes time to rearchitect, plus i'm sure 
there's performance issues to solve if such a model is exposed via perf, 
but users and developers would be _very_ well served by such 
capabilities:

 - clean, syscall based API available to monitor tasks, workloads and 
   CPUs. (or the whole system)

 - sampling (profiling)

 - tracing, post-process scripting via Perl plugins

etc.

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-10  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-10  7:31 [RFC mm][PATCH 0/5] per mm counter updates KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10  7:33 ` [RFC mm][PATCH 1/5] mm counter cleanup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10 17:30   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-10 23:42     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-11  0:07     ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-10  7:34 ` [RFC mm][PATCH 2/5] percpu cached mm counter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10  7:54   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-12-10  8:20     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10  8:33       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-10  8:42         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10 17:35         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-10 17:38           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-10 18:04             ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-10 18:54               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-11  0:11                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10 17:34     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-10 17:51   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-11  0:30     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-11  0:40   ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-11  0:51     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-11  1:25       ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-11  1:26         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10  7:59 ` [RFC mm][PATCH 3/5] counting swap ents per mm KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10 17:55   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-11  0:33     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-11  1:07   ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-10  8:00 ` [RFC mm][PATCH 4/5] add a lowmem check function KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-10 17:59   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-11  0:39     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-11 13:35       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-11  1:09   ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-10  8:01 ` [RFC mm][PATCH 5/5] counting lowmem rss per mm KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-11  1:12   ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-10  8:03 ` [RFC mm][PATCH 0/5] per mm counter updates KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091210075454.GB25549@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox