From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD5460021B for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:25:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:25:55 +0100 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 9 (hwpoison) Message-ID: <20091209172555.GG18989@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20091209174738.3b8c28a6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091209090921.a3293706.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091209090921.a3293706.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Andi Kleen , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:09:21AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:47:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > My usual call for calm: please do not put stuff destined for 2.6.34 into > > linux-next trees until after 2.6.33-rc1. > > > > Changes since 20091208: > > > > > > The hwpoison tree lost its build failure. > > > CONFIG_PROC_PAGE_MONITOR is not enabled: > > > mm/built-in.o: In function `hwpoison_filter': > (.text+0x43cce): undefined reference to `stable_page_flags' Thanks. Fengguang fixed that already, but I haven't pushed out an update tree yet. Will do soon. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org