From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm 5/7] memcg: avoid oom during moving charge
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:14:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091204161439.2e584630.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091204145154.4d184f1d.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:51:54 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> This move-charge-at-task-migration feature has extra charges on "to"(pre-charges)
> and "from"(leftover charges) during moving charge. This means unnecessary oom
> can happen.
>
> This patch tries to avoid such oom.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
>
> Changelog: 2009/12/04
> - take account of "from" too, because we uncharge from "from" at once in
> mem_cgroup_clear_mc(), so leftover charges exist during moving charge.
> - check use_hierarchy of "mem_over_limit", instead of "to" or "from"(bugfix).
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 769b85a..f50ad15 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ struct move_charge_struct {
> struct mem_cgroup *to;
> unsigned long precharge;
> unsigned long moved_charge;
> + struct task_struct *moving_task; /* a task moving charges */
> };
> static struct move_charge_struct mc;
>
> @@ -1504,6 +1505,40 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
> if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(mem_over_limit))
> continue;
>
> + /* try to avoid oom while someone is moving charge */
> + if (mc.moving_task && current != mc.moving_task) {
> + struct mem_cgroup *from, *to;
> + bool do_continue = false;
> + /*
> + * There is a small race that "from" or "to" can be
> + * freed by rmdir, so we use css_tryget().
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + from = mc.from;
> + to = mc.to;
> + if (from && css_tryget(&from->css)) {
> + if (mem_over_limit->use_hierarchy)
> + do_continue = css_is_ancestor(
> + &from->css,
> + &mem_over_limit->css);
> + else
> + do_continue = (from == mem_over_limit);
> + css_put(&from->css);
> + }
> + if (!do_continue && to && css_tryget(&to->css)) {
> + if (mem_over_limit->use_hierarchy)
> + do_continue = css_is_ancestor(
> + &to->css,
> + &mem_over_limit->css);
> + else
> + do_continue = (to == mem_over_limit);
> + css_put(&to->css);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (do_continue)
> + continue;
Hmm. do countine without any relaxing ? can't this occupy cpu ?
Can't we add schedule() or some and put into sleep ?
Maybe the best way is enqueue this thread to mc.wait_queue and wait for
the end of task moving.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-04 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-04 5:46 [PATCH -mmotm 0/7] memcg: move charge at task migration (04/Dec) Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 5:47 ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/7] cgroup: introduce cancel_attach() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 5:48 ` [PATCH -mmotm 2/7] memcg: add interface to move charge at task migration Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 6:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-04 5:49 ` [PATCH -mmotm 3/7] memcg: move charges of anonymous page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 5:50 ` [PATCH -mmotm 4/7] memcg: improbe performance in moving charge Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 7:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-04 7:29 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 5:51 ` [PATCH -mmotm 5/7] memcg: avoid oom during " Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 7:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-12-04 7:43 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 5:52 ` [PATCH -mmotm 6/7] memcg: move charges of anonymous swap Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 7:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-04 10:53 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 5:54 ` [PATCH -mmotm 7/7] memcg: improbe performance in moving swap charge Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 6:53 ` [PATCH -mmotm 0/7] memcg: move charge at task migration (04/Dec) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-04 7:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-07 6:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-09 0:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-04 7:09 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-04 7:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091204161439.2e584630.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox