linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] high system time & lock contention running large mixed workload
Date: Fri,  4 Dec 2009 09:36:21 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091204092445.587D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259878496.2345.57.camel@dhcp-100-19-198.bos.redhat.com>

> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 21:20 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> > This is reasonable, except for the fact that pages that are moved
> > to the inactive list without having the referenced bit cleared are
> > guaranteed to be moved back to the active list.
> > 
> > You'll be better off without that excess list movement, by simply
> > moving pages directly back onto the active list if the trylock
> > fails.
> > 
> 
> 
> The attached patch addresses this issue by changing page_check_address()
> to return -1 if the spin_trylock() fails and page_referenced_one() to
> return 1 in that path so the page gets moved back to the active list.
> 
> Also, BTW, check this out: an 8-CPU/16GB system running AIM 7 Compute
> has 196491 isolated_anon pages.  This means that ~6140 processes are
> somewhere down in try_to_free_pages() since we only isolate 32 pages at
> a time, this is out of 9000 processes...
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> active_anon:2140361 inactive_anon:453356 isolated_anon:196491
>  active_file:3438 inactive_file:1100 isolated_file:0
>  unevictable:2802 dirty:153 writeback:0 unstable:0
>  free:578920 slab_reclaimable:49214 slab_unreclaimable:93268
>  mapped:1105 shmem:0 pagetables:139100 bounce:0
> 
> Node 0 Normal free:1647892kB min:12500kB low:15624kB high:18748kB 
> active_anon:7835452kB inactive_anon:785764kB active_file:13672kB 
> inactive_file:4352kB unevictable:11208kB isolated(anon):785964kB 
> isolated(file):0kB present:12410880kB mlocked:11208kB dirty:604kB 
> writeback:0kB mapped:4344kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:177792kB 
> slab_unreclaimable:368676kB kernel_stack:73256kB pagetables:489972kB 
> unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0
> 
> 202895 total pagecache pages
> 197629 pages in swap cache
> Swap cache stats: add 6954838, delete 6757209, find 1251447/2095005
> Free swap  = 65881196kB
> Total swap = 67354616kB
> 3997696 pages RAM
> 207046 pages reserved
> 1688629 pages shared
> 3016248 pages non-shared

This seems we have to improve reclaim bale out logic. the system already
have 1.5GB free pages. IOW, the system don't need swap-out anymore.



> @@ -352,9 +359,11 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct page *page,
>  	if (address == -EFAULT)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	pte = page_check_address(page, mm, address, &ptl, 0);
> +	pte = page_check_address(page, mm, address, &ptl, 0, trylock);
>  	if (!pte)
>  		goto out;
> +	else if (pte == (pte_t *)-1)
> +		return 1;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't want to elevate referenced for mlocked page that gets this far,

Sorry, NAK.
I have to say the same thing of Rik's previous mention. shrink_active_list()
ignore the return value of page_referenced(). then above 'return 1' is meaningless.

Umm, ok, I'll make the patch myself.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-04  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-25 18:37 [PATCH] vmscan: do not evict inactive pages when skipping an active list scan Rik van Riel
2009-11-25 20:35 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-11-25 20:47   ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-26  2:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-26  2:57   ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-30 22:00 ` [RFC] high system time & lock contention running large mixed workload Larry Woodman
2009-12-01 10:04   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-12-01 12:31     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-01 12:46       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-12-02  2:02         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-02  2:04         ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-02  2:00     ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-01 12:23   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-01 16:41     ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-02  2:20       ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-02  2:41         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-03 22:14         ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-04  0:29           ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-04 21:26             ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-06 21:04               ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-04  0:36           ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-12-04 19:31             ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-02  2:55     ` [PATCH] Clear reference bit although page isn't mapped KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-02  3:07       ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-02  3:28         ` [PATCH] Replace page_mapping_inuse() with page_mapped() KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-02  4:57           ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-02 11:07           ` Johannes Weiner
2009-12-02  1:55   ` [RFC] high system time & lock contention running large mixed workload Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091204092445.587D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox