From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: memcg: slab control
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:14:04 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091201140726.5C28.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <604427e00911262315n5d520cf4p447f68e7053adc11@mail.gmail.com>
> We can either not count those allocations, or do some special
> treatment to remember who owns those allocations.
> In our networking intensive workload, it causes us lots of trouble of
> miscounting the networking slabs for incoming
> packets. So we make changes in the networking stack which records the
> owner of the socket and then charge the
> slab later using that recorded information.
I agree, currentlly network intensive workload is problematic. but I don't think
network memory management improvement need to change generic slab management.
Why can't we improve current tcp/udp memory accounting? it is good user interface than
"amount of slab memory".
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-01 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 23:08 David Rientjes
2009-11-26 1:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26 8:50 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-26 8:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26 9:10 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-26 9:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26 9:56 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-26 10:24 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2009-11-26 12:31 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-26 12:52 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2009-12-01 7:40 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-27 7:15 ` Ying Han
2009-11-27 9:45 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-12-01 5:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-11-30 22:57 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-01 10:31 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-12-01 22:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-01 7:36 ` Balbir Singh
2009-12-01 10:40 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-12-01 15:14 ` Balbir Singh
2009-12-02 10:14 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-12-02 10:19 ` Balbir Singh
2009-12-02 10:51 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-30 22:55 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-01 10:39 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-26 10:13 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2009-11-30 9:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-30 22:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-26 1:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26 10:01 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2009-11-26 2:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-27 7:01 ` Ying Han
2009-11-27 9:48 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091201140726.5C28.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox