From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
cl@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v3
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:36:42 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091111113559.FD4D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091111112404.0026e601.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hioryu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Fixing node-oriented allocation handling in oom-kill.c
> I myself think this as bugfix not as ehnancement.
>
> In these days, things are changed as
> - alloc_pages() eats nodemask as its arguments, __alloc_pages_nodemask().
> - mempolicy don't maintain its own private zonelists.
> (And cpuset doesn't use nodemask for __alloc_pages_nodemask())
>
> But, current oom-killer's doesn't handle nodemask and it's wrong.
>
> This patch does
> - check nodemask, if nodemask && nodemask doesn't cover all
> node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY], this is CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY.
> - Scan all zonelist under nodemask, if it hits cpuset's wall
> this faiulre is from cpuset.
> And
> - modifies the caller of out_of_memory not to call oom if __GFP_THISNODE.
> This doesn't change "current" behavior.
> If callers use __GFP_THISNODE, it should handle "page allocation failure"
> by itself.
>
> Changelog: 2009/11/11
> - fixed nodes_equal() calculation.
> - return CONSTRAINT_MEMPOLICY always if given nodemask is not enough big.
>
> Changelog: 2009/11/06
> - fixed lack of oom.h
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hioryu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/sysrq.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/oom.h | 4 +++-
> mm/oom_kill.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> mm/page_alloc.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 8:09 [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06 0:02 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10 7:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-10 7:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10 7:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-10 7:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10 8:03 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-10 8:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 2:24 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 2:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-11-11 2:49 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11 3:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-11 3:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 3:14 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11 3:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-11 3:27 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11 3:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 4:45 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v4 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 5:28 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v4.1 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 5:58 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11 6:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 6:26 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-11 6:34 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v4.2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 7:32 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-18 0:11 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-18 0:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-18 2:13 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15 1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-15 1:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15 1:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 4:30 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15 4:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15 4:54 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15 5:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-17 22:21 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-18 4:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-18 10:04 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15 4:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15 4:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15 4:57 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-15 5:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-17 22:23 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-17 23:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-15 4:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 5:03 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-18 1:41 ` Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091111113559.FD4D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox