linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [PATCH -mmotm 2/3] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent()
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:37:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091111103741.f35e9ffe.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091111103533.c634ff8d.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>

mem_cgroup_move_parent() calls try_charge first and cancel_charge on failure.
IMHO, charge/uncharge(especially charge) is high cost operation, so we should
avoid it as far as possible.

This patch tries to delay try_charge in mem_cgroup_move_parent() by re-ordering
checks it does.

And this patch renames mem_cgroup_move_account() to __mem_cgroup_move_account(),
changes the return value of __mem_cgroup_move_account() from int to void,
and adds a new wrapper(mem_cgroup_move_account()), which checks whether a @pc
is valid for moving account and calls __mem_cgroup_move_account().

This patch removes the last caller of trylock_page_cgroup(), so removes its
definition too.

Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/page_cgroup.h |    7 +---
 mm/memcontrol.c             |   84 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
index 4b938d4..b0e4eb1 100644
--- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static inline void ClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc)	\
 static inline int TestClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc)	\
 	{ return test_and_clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags);  }
 
+TESTPCGFLAG(Locked, LOCK)
+
 /* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */
 TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
 CLEARPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
@@ -86,11 +88,6 @@ static inline void lock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
 	bit_spin_lock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
 }
 
-static inline int trylock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
-{
-	return bit_spin_trylock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
-}
-
 static inline void unlock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
 {
 	bit_spin_unlock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index d92c398..2f1283b 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1613,27 +1613,22 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 }
 
 /**
- * mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
+ * __mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
  * @pc:	page_cgroup of the page.
  * @from: mem_cgroup which the page is moved from.
  * @to:	mem_cgroup which the page is moved to. @from != @to.
  *
  * The caller must confirm following.
  * - page is not on LRU (isolate_page() is useful.)
- *
- * returns 0 at success,
- * returns -EBUSY when lock is busy or "pc" is unstable.
+ * - the pc is locked, used, and ->mem_cgroup points to @from.
  *
  * This function does "uncharge" from old cgroup but doesn't do "charge" to
  * new cgroup. It should be done by a caller.
  */
 
-static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 	struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *from_mz, *to_mz;
-	int nid, zid;
-	int ret = -EBUSY;
 	struct page *page;
 	int cpu;
 	struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat;
@@ -1641,20 +1636,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(from == to);
 	VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(pc->page));
-
-	nid = page_cgroup_nid(pc);
-	zid = page_cgroup_zid(pc);
-	from_mz =  mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(from, nid, zid);
-	to_mz =  mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(to, nid, zid);
-
-	if (!trylock_page_cgroup(pc))
-		return ret;
-
-	if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
-		goto out;
-
-	if (pc->mem_cgroup != from)
-		goto out;
+	VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupLocked(pc));
+	VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupUsed(pc));
+	VM_BUG_ON(pc->mem_cgroup != from);
 
 	if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(from))
 		res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -1683,15 +1667,28 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 	css_get(&to->css);
 	pc->mem_cgroup = to;
 	mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(to, pc, true);
-	ret = 0;
-out:
-	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
 	/*
 	 * We charges against "to" which may not have any tasks. Then, "to"
 	 * can be under rmdir(). But in current implementation, caller of
 	 * this function is just force_empty() and it's garanteed that
 	 * "to" is never removed. So, we don't check rmdir status here.
 	 */
+}
+
+/*
+ * check whether the @pc is valid for moving account and call
+ * __mem_cgroup_move_account()
+ */
+static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+				struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
+{
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	lock_page_cgroup(pc);
+	if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) {
+		__mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to);
+		ret = 0;
+	}
+	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1713,38 +1710,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 	if (!pcg)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	ret = -EBUSY;
+	if (!get_page_unless_zero(page))
+		goto out;
+	if (isolate_lru_page(page))
+		goto put;
 
 	parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(pcg);
-
-
 	ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, gfp_mask, &parent, false, page);
 	if (ret || !parent)
-		return ret;
-
-	if (!get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		goto uncharge;
-	}
-
-	ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
-
-	if (ret)
-		goto cancel;
+		goto put_back;
 
 	ret = mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, child, parent);
-
+	if (!ret)
+		css_put(&parent->css);	/* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */
+	else
+		mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent);	/* does css_put */
+put_back:
 	putback_lru_page(page);
-	if (!ret) {
-		put_page(page);
-		/* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */
-		css_put(&parent->css);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-cancel:
+put:
 	put_page(page);
-uncharge:
-	mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent);
+out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.5.6.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-11  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-06  5:10 [PATCH -mmotm 0/8] memcg: recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:11 ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/8] cgroup: introduce cancel_attach() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-09  6:57   ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  7:18     ` Li Zefan
2009-11-09  7:23     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-09  7:23   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-09  7:38     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:11 ` [PATCH -mmotm 2/8] memcg: move memcg_tasklist mutex Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:54   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  7:49     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  8:02       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10 19:14   ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-10 23:44     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:12 ` [PATCH -mmotm 3/8] memcg: add mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:13 ` [PATCH -mmotm 4/8] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:56   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:14 ` [PATCH -mmotm 5/8] memcg: add interface to recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:06   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:14 ` [PATCH -mmotm 6/8] memcg: recharge charges of anonymous page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:35   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  0:31     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:15 ` [PATCH -mmotm 7/8] memcg: avoid oom during recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:39   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:16 ` [PATCH -mmotm 8/8] memcg: recharge charges of anonymous swap Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:45 ` [PATCH -mmotm 0/8] memcg: recharge at task move KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  1:44   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-09  5:16     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  5:08 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  8:24   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:35 ` [PATCH -mmotm 0/3] some cleanups for memcg Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:36   ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/3] memcg: add mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  4:24     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-11  1:37   ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2009-11-11 14:40     ` [PATCH -mmotm 2/3] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent() Balbir Singh
2009-11-11 15:16       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:39   ` [PATCH -mmotm 3/3] memcg: remove memcg_tasklist Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:49     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 16:01     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-12  8:05       ` Daisuke Nishimura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091111103741.f35e9ffe.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox