Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg : rewrite percpu countings with new interfaces

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:37:37 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
 
> > after==
> >  Performance counter stats for './runpause.sh' (5 runs):
> > 
> >   474919.429670  task-clock-msecs         #      7.896 CPUs    ( +-   0.013% )
> >        36520440  page-faults              #      0.077 M/sec   ( +-   1.854% )
> >      3109834751  cache-references         #      6.548 M/sec   ( +-   0.276% )
> >      1053275160  cache-misses             #      2.218 M/sec   ( +-   0.036% )
> > 
> >    60.146585280  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.019% )
> > 
> > This test is affected by cpu-utilization but I think more improvements
> > will be found in bigger system.
> >
> 
> Hi, Kamezawa-San,
> 
> Could you please post the IPC results as well? 
> 
Because PREEMPT=n, no differnce between v1/v2, basically.

Here.
==
 Performance counter stats for './runpause.sh' (5 runs):

  475884.969949  task-clock-msecs         #      7.913 CPUs    ( +-   0.005% )
       36592060  page-faults              #      0.077 M/sec   ( +-   0.301% )
     3037784893  cache-references         #      6.383 M/sec   ( +-   0.361% )  (scaled from 99.71%)
     1130761297  cache-misses             #      2.376 M/sec   ( +-   0.244% )  (scaled from 98.24%)

   60.136803969  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.006% )
==

But this program is highly affected by cpu utilization etc...

Thanks,
-Kame



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>