linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm 1/8] cgroup: introduce cancel_attach()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:23:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109162330.e6a268b7.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091109065759.GC3042@balbir.in.ibm.com>

On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:27:59 +0530, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> [2009-11-06 14:11:06]:
> 
> > This patch adds cancel_attach() operation to struct cgroup_subsys.
> > cancel_attach() can be used when can_attach() operation prepares something
> > for the subsys, but we should rollback what can_attach() operation has prepared
> > if attach task fails after we've succeeded in can_attach().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt |   13 +++++++++++-
> >  include/linux/cgroup.h            |    2 +
> >  kernel/cgroup.c                   |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
> > index 0b33bfe..c86947c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
> > @@ -536,10 +536,21 @@ returns an error, this will abort the attach operation.  If a NULL
> >  task is passed, then a successful result indicates that *any*
> >  unspecified task can be moved into the cgroup. Note that this isn't
> >  called on a fork. If this method returns 0 (success) then this should
> > -remain valid while the caller holds cgroup_mutex. If threadgroup is
> > +remain valid while the caller holds cgroup_mutex and it is ensured that either
> > +attach() or cancel_attach() will be called in futer. If threadgroup is
> >  true, then a successful result indicates that all threads in the given
> >  thread's threadgroup can be moved together.
> > 
> > +void cancel_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp,
> > +	       struct task_struct *task, bool threadgroup)
> > +(cgroup_mutex held by caller)
> > +
> > +Called when a task attach operation has failed after can_attach() has succeeded.
> > +A subsystem whose can_attach() has some side-effects should provide this
> > +function, so that the subsytem can implement a rollback. If not, not necessary.
> > +This will be called only about subsystems whose can_attach() operation have
> > +succeeded.
> > +
> >  void attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp,
> >  	    struct cgroup *old_cgrp, struct task_struct *task,
> >  	    bool threadgroup)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > index 0008dee..d4cc200 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > @@ -427,6 +427,8 @@ struct cgroup_subsys {
> >  	void (*destroy)(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp);
> >  	int (*can_attach)(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp,
> >  			  struct task_struct *tsk, bool threadgroup);
> > +	void (*cancel_attach)(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp,
> > +			  struct task_struct *tsk, bool threadgroup);
> >  	void (*attach)(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp,
> >  			struct cgroup *old_cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk,
> >  			bool threadgroup);
> > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> > index 0249f4b..e443742 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> > @@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ int cgroup_path(const struct cgroup *cgrp, char *buf, int buflen)
> >  int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  {
> >  	int retval = 0;
> > -	struct cgroup_subsys *ss;
> > +	struct cgroup_subsys *ss, *failed_ss = NULL;
> >  	struct cgroup *oldcgrp;
> >  	struct css_set *cg;
> >  	struct css_set *newcg;
> > @@ -1553,8 +1553,16 @@ int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  	for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
> >  		if (ss->can_attach) {
> >  			retval = ss->can_attach(ss, cgrp, tsk, false);
> > -			if (retval)
> > -				return retval;
> > +			if (retval) {
> > +				/*
> > +				 * Remember at which subsystem we've failed in
> > +				 * can_attach() to call cancel_attach() only
> > +				 * against subsystems whose attach() have
> > +				 * succeeded(see below).
> > +				 */
> > +				failed_ss = ss;
> 
> failed_ss is global? Is it a marker into an array of subsystems? Don't
> we need more than one failed_ss for each failed subsystem? Or do we
> find the first failed subsystem, cancel_attach and fail all
> migrations?
> 
failed_ss is just a local valiable(see above definition) :)
It is used to remember "at which subsystem of for_each_subsys we failed in can_attach()".
By remembering it, we can avoid calling cancel_attach() against subsystems whose
can_attach() has failed or has not even called.


Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

> > +				goto out;
> > +			}
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > 
> > @@ -1568,14 +1576,17 @@ int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  	 */
> >  	newcg = find_css_set(cg, cgrp);
> >  	put_css_set(cg);
> > -	if (!newcg)
> > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	if (!newcg) {
> > +		retval = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> > 
> >  	task_lock(tsk);
> >  	if (tsk->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> >  		task_unlock(tsk);
> >  		put_css_set(newcg);
> > -		return -ESRCH;
> > +		retval = -ESRCH;
> > +		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  	rcu_assign_pointer(tsk->cgroups, newcg);
> >  	task_unlock(tsk);
> > @@ -1601,7 +1612,20 @@ int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  	 * is no longer empty.
> >  	 */
> >  	cgroup_wakeup_rmdir_waiter(cgrp);
> > -	return 0;
> > +out:
> > +	if (retval)
> > +		for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
> > +			if (ss == failed_ss)
> > +				/*
> > +				 * This means can_attach() of this subsystem
> > +				 * have failed, so we don't need to call
> > +				 * cancel_attach() against rests of subsystems.
> > +				 */
> > +				break;
> > +			if (ss->cancel_attach)
> > +				ss->cancel_attach(ss, cgrp, tsk, false);
> > +		}
> > +	return retval;
> >  }
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-09  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-06  5:10 [PATCH -mmotm 0/8] memcg: recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:11 ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/8] cgroup: introduce cancel_attach() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-09  6:57   ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  7:18     ` Li Zefan
2009-11-09  7:23     ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2009-11-09  7:23   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-09  7:38     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:11 ` [PATCH -mmotm 2/8] memcg: move memcg_tasklist mutex Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:54   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  7:49     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  8:02       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10 19:14   ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-10 23:44     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:12 ` [PATCH -mmotm 3/8] memcg: add mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:13 ` [PATCH -mmotm 4/8] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:56   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:14 ` [PATCH -mmotm 5/8] memcg: add interface to recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:06   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:14 ` [PATCH -mmotm 6/8] memcg: recharge charges of anonymous page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:35   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  0:31     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:15 ` [PATCH -mmotm 7/8] memcg: avoid oom during recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:39   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:16 ` [PATCH -mmotm 8/8] memcg: recharge charges of anonymous swap Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:45 ` [PATCH -mmotm 0/8] memcg: recharge at task move KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  1:44   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-09  5:16     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  5:08 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  8:24   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:35 ` [PATCH -mmotm 0/3] some cleanups for memcg Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:36   ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/3] memcg: add mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  4:24     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-11  1:37   ` [PATCH -mmotm 2/3] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11 14:40     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-11 15:16       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:39   ` [PATCH -mmotm 3/3] memcg: remove memcg_tasklist Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:49     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 16:01     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-12  8:05       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-14  6:17 [PATCH -mmotm 0/8] memcg: move charge at task migration (14/Dec) Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-14  6:18 ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/8] cgroup: introduce cancel_attach() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-21  5:31 [PATCH -mmotm 0/8] memcg: move charge at task migration (21/Dec) Daisuke Nishimura
2009-12-21  5:32 ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/8] cgroup: introduce cancel_attach() Daisuke Nishimura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091109162330.e6a268b7.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox