Re: [RFC][PATCH] lib: generic percpu counter array

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Thank you for review.

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:15:36 -0500 (EST)
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 
> > +static inline void
> > +counter_array_add(struct counter_array *ca, int idx, int val)
> > +{
> > +	ca->counters[idx] += val;
> > +}
> 
> This is not a per cpu operation and therefore expensive. The new percpu
> this_cpu_inc f.e. generates a single x86 instruction for an increment.
> 
This code is for !SMP.


> > +void __counter_array_add(struct counter_array *ca, int idx, int val, int batch)
> > +{
> > +	long count, *pcount;
> > +
> > +	preempt_disable();
> > +
> > +	pcount = this_cpu_ptr(ca->v.array);
> > +	count = pcount[idx] + val;
> > +	if (!ca->v.nosync && ((count > batch) || (count < -batch))) {
> > +		atomic_long_add(count, &ca->counters[idx]);
> > +		pcount[idx] = 0;
> > +	} else
> > +		pcount[idx] = count;
> > +	preempt_enable();
> > +}
> 
> Too expensive to use in critical VM paths. The percpu operations generate
> a single instruction instead of the code above. No need for preempt etc.
> 
Hmm, ok. I'll have to see your patch, more.
I wonder how to use indexed-array and ops like add_return..


Thanks,
-Kame



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>