Re: [RFC][-mm][PATCH 3/6] oom-killer: count lowmem rss

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:24:01 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 
> > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > 
> > Count lowmem rss per mm_struct. Lowmem here means...
> > 
> >    for NUMA, pages in a zone < policy_zone.
> >    for HIGHMEM x86, pages in NORMAL zone.
> >    for others, all pages are lowmem.
> > 
> > Now, lower_zone_protection[] works very well for protecting lowmem but
> > possiblity of lowmem-oom is not 0 even if under good protection in the kernel.
> > (As fact, it's can be configured by sysctl. When we keep it high, there
> >  will be tons of not-for-use memory but system will be protected against
> >  rare event of lowmem-oom.)
> 
> Right, lowmem isn't addressed currently by the oom killer.  Adding this 
> constraint will probably make the heuristics much harder to write and 
> understand.  It's not always clear that we want to kill a task using 
> lowmem just because another task needs some, for instance.
The same  can be said against all oom-kill ;)

> Do you think we'll need a way to defer killing any task is no task is
> heuristically found to be hogging lowmem?

Yes, I think so. But my position is a bit different.

In typical x86-32 server case, which has 4-8G memory, most of memory usage
is highmem. So, if we have no knowledge of lowmem, multiple innocent processes
will be killed in every 30 secs of oom-kill. 

My final goal is migrating lowmem pages to highmem as kswapd-migraion or
oom-migration. Total rewrite for this will be required in future.

Thanks,
-Kame




Thanks,
-Kame



Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>