From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/5] vmscan: Kill hibernation specific reclaim logic and unify it
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:00:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911032300.14790.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF09CB2.9030500@crca.org.au>
On Tuesday 03 November 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Rafael.
>
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday 02 November 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >>>> I haven't given much thought to numa awareness in hibernate code, but I
> >>>> can say that the shrink_all_memory interface is woefully inadequate as
> >>>> far as zone awareness goes. Since lowmem needs to be atomically restored
> >>>> before we can restore highmem, we really need to be able to ask for a
> >>>> particular number of pages of a particular zone type to be freed.
> >>> Honestly, I am not suspend/hibernation expert. Can I ask why caller need to know
> >>> per-zone number of freed pages information? if hibernation don't need highmem.
> >>> following incremental patch prevent highmem reclaim perfectly. Is it enough?
> >> (Disclaimer: I don't think about highmem a lot any more, and might have
> >> forgotten some of the details, or swsusp's algorithms might have
> >> changed. Rafael might need to correct some of this...)
> >>
> >> Imagine that you have a system with 1000 pages of lowmem and 5000 pages
> >> of highmem. Of these, 950 lowmem pages are in use and 500 highmem pages
> >> are in use.
> >>
> >> In order to to be able to save an image, we need to be able to do an
> >> atomic copy of those lowmem pages.
> >>
> >> You might think that we could just copy everything into the spare
> >> highmem pages, but we can't because mapping and unmapping the highmem
> >> pages as we copy the data will leave us with an inconsistent copy.
> >
> > This isn't the case any more for the mainline hibernate code. We use highmem
> > for storing image data as well as lowmem.
>
> Highmem for storing copies of lowmem pages?
It is possible in theory, but I don't think it happens in practice given the
way in which the memory is freed. Still copy_data_page() takes this
possibility into account.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-03 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-01 15:08 [PATCHv2 1/5] vmscan: separate sc.swap_cluster_max and sc.nr_max_reclaim KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-01 15:09 ` [PATCHv2 2/5] vmscan: Kill hibernation specific reclaim logic and unify it KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-01 15:12 ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-01 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-02 15:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-02 19:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-03 14:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-03 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-01 22:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-11-02 15:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-02 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-02 21:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-11-03 11:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-03 21:12 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-11-03 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-11-12 12:33 ` using highmem for atomic copy of lowmem was " Pavel Machek
2009-11-12 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-03 14:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-03 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-01 15:11 ` [PATCHv2 3/5] vmscan: Stop zone_reclaim()'s wrong swap_cluster_max usage KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-01 17:51 ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-02 0:40 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-01 15:12 ` [PATCHv2 4/5] vmscan: Kill sc.swap_cluster_max KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-01 17:56 ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-02 0:46 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-01 15:13 ` [PATCHv2 5/5][nit fix] vmscan Make consistent of reclaim bale out between do_try_to_free_page and shrink_zone KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-01 17:58 ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-02 0:48 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-02 0:35 ` [PATCHv2 1/5] vmscan: separate sc.swap_cluster_max and sc.nr_max_reclaim Minchan Kim
2009-11-02 0:48 ` Minchan Kim
2009-11-02 15:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-02 23:34 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911032300.14790.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox