linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Sven Geggus <lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de>,
	Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mohamed Abbas <mohamed.abbas@intel.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:30:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091102203034.GC22046@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091030142350.GA9343@bizet.domek.prywatny>

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 03:23:50PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:59:26AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:42:08PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:46:56PM +0100, Mel LKML wrote:
> > > I've tested patches 1+2+3+4 in my normal usage scenario (do some work,
> > > suspend, do work, suspend, ...) and it failed today after 4 days (== 4
> > > suspend-resume cycles).
> > > 
> > > I'll test 1-5 now.
> 
> 2.6.32-rc5 with patches 1-5 fails too.
> 
> 
> > Also, what was the behaviour of the e100 driver when suspending before
> > this commit?
> > 
> > 6905b1f1a03a48dcf115a2927f7b87dba8d5e566: Net / e100: Fix suspend of devices that cannot be power managed
> 
> This was discussed before with e100 maintainers and Rafael.  Reverting
> this patch didn't change anything.
> 

Does applying the following on top make any difference?

==== CUT HERE ====
PM: Shrink memory before suspend

This is a partial revert of c6f37f12197ac3bd2e5a35f2f0e195ae63d437de. It
is an outside possibility for fixing the e100 bug where an order-5
allocation is failing during resume. The commit notes that the shrinking
of memory should be unnecessary but maybe it is in error.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c
index 6f10dfc..4f6ae64 100644
--- a/kernel/power/suspend.c
+++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ const char *const pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_MAX] = {
 	[PM_SUSPEND_MEM]	= "mem",
 };
 
+/* This is just an arbitrary number */
+#define FREE_PAGE_NUMBER (100)
+
 static struct platform_suspend_ops *suspend_ops;
 
 /**
@@ -78,6 +81,7 @@ static int suspend_test(int level)
 static int suspend_prepare(void)
 {
 	int error;
+	unsigned int free_pages;
 
 	if (!suspend_ops || !suspend_ops->enter)
 		return -EPERM;
@@ -92,10 +96,24 @@ static int suspend_prepare(void)
 	if (error)
 		goto Finish;
 
-	error = suspend_freeze_processes();
+	if (suspend_freeze_processes()) {
+		error = -EAGAIN;
+		goto Thaw;
+	}
+
+	free_pages = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES);
+	if (free_pages < FREE_PAGE_NUMBER) {
+		pr_debug("PM: free some memory\n");
+		shrink_all_memory(FREE_PAGE_NUMBER - free_pages);
+		if (nr_free_pages() < FREE_PAGE_NUMBER) {
+			error = -ENOMEM;
+			printk(KERN_ERR "PM: No enough memory\n");
+		}
+	}
 	if (!error)
 		return 0;
 
+ Thaw:
 	suspend_thaw_processes();
 	usermodehelper_enable();
  Finish:

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-02 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-22 14:22 Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] page allocator: Always wake kswapd when restarting an allocation attempt after direct reclaim failed Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:24   ` [PATCH 1/5 Against 2.6.31.4] " Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:41   ` [PATCH 1/5] " Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 15:49     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26  1:11   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-26  7:10     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27  2:42       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-27 12:27         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use ALLOC_HARDER Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 16:33   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-22 16:37     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23  9:57       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-24  2:03       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-27 15:19         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-25 12:57       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-26  1:15   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order watermarks are being hit Mel Gorman
2009-10-23 17:52   ` Vincent Li
2009-10-23 22:12     ` Vincent Li
2009-10-27 10:38     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] page allocator: Pre-emptively wake kswapd when high-order watermarks are hit Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 19:41   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-23  9:13     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23  9:36       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-23 11:25         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23 11:31           ` Tobias Oetiker
2009-10-23 13:39             ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-27 15:26     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ONLY-APPLY-IF-STILL-FAILING Revert 373c0a7e, 8aa7e847: Fix congestion_wait() sync/async vs read/write confusion Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:25   ` Against 2.6.31.4 [PATCH 5/5] " Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 21:49   ` [PATCH 5/5] ONLY-APPLY-IF-STILL-FAILING " Jens Axboe
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-27 10:29     ` Frans Pop
2009-10-22 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2 Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 16:03   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-24  1:52   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-24  6:48     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-24  6:48     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 15:43 ` reinette chatre
2009-10-27 10:40   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27 23:34     ` reinette chatre
2009-10-23  7:31 ` Sven Geggus
2009-10-23 16:58 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-23 21:12   ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-24 13:46     ` Mel LKML
2009-10-28 11:42       ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-28 11:59         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-30 14:23           ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-11-02 20:30             ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-11-04  2:03               ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-28 12:55         ` Tobi Oetiker
2009-10-24 13:51 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-24 14:02 ` Sven Geggus
2009-10-27 13:27   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26 17:37 ` Tobias Oetiker
2009-10-27 15:36   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26 22:17 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-26 23:45   ` Frans Pop
2009-11-06  6:03 ` Tobias Diedrich
2009-11-06  9:24   ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-06  9:24   ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-06 11:15     ` Tobias Diedrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091102203034.GC22046@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
    --cc=karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de \
    --cc=mohamed.abbas@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=tobi@oetiker.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox