linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Sven Geggus <lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de>,
	Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>,
	Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Mohamed Abbas <mohamed.abbas@intel.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org\"" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] page allocator: Pre-emptively wake kswapd when high-order watermarks are hit
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:42:58 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091026235032.2F78.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256221356-26049-5-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

> When a high-order allocation fails, kswapd is kicked so that it reclaims
> at a higher-order to avoid direct reclaimers stall and to help GFP_ATOMIC
> allocations. Something has changed in recent kernels that affect the timing
> where high-order GFP_ATOMIC allocations are now failing with more frequency,
> particularly under pressure.
> 
> This patch pre-emptively checks if watermarks have been hit after a
> high-order allocation completes successfully. If the watermarks have been
> reached, kswapd is woken in the hope it fixes the watermarks before the
> next GFP_ATOMIC allocation fails.
> 
> Warning, this patch is somewhat of a band-aid. If this makes a difference,
> it still implies that something has changed that is either causing more
> GFP_ATOMIC allocations to occur (such as the case with iwlagn wireless
> driver) or make them more likely to fail.

hmm, I'm confused. this description addressed generic high order allocation.
but, 

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 7f2aa3e..851df40 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1596,6 +1596,17 @@ try_next_zone:
>  	return page;
>  }
>  
> +static inline
> +void wake_all_kswapd(unsigned int order, struct zonelist *zonelist,
> +						enum zone_type high_zoneidx)
> +{
> +	struct zoneref *z;
> +	struct zone *zone;
> +
> +	for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx)
> +		wakeup_kswapd(zone, order);
> +}
> +
>  static inline int
>  should_alloc_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  				unsigned long pages_reclaimed)
> @@ -1730,18 +1741,18 @@ __alloc_pages_high_priority(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,

__alloc_pages_high_priority() is only called if ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS.
ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS mean PF_MEMALLOC or TIF_MEMDIE and GFP_ATOMIC don't make
nested alloc_pages() (= don't make PF_MEMALLOC case). 
Then, I haven't understand why this patch improve iwlagn GFP_ATOMIC case.

hmm, maybe I missed something. I see the code again tommorow.


>  			congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
>  	} while (!page && (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL));
>  
> -	return page;
> -}
> -
> -static inline
> -void wake_all_kswapd(unsigned int order, struct zonelist *zonelist,
> -						enum zone_type high_zoneidx)
> -{
> -	struct zoneref *z;
> -	struct zone *zone;
> +	/*
> +	 * If after a high-order allocation we are now below watermarks,
> +	 * pre-emptively kick kswapd rather than having the next allocation
> +	 * fail and have to wake up kswapd, potentially failing GFP_ATOMIC
> +	 * allocations or entering direct reclaim
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(order) && page && !zone_watermark_ok(preferred_zone, order,
> +				preferred_zone->watermark[ALLOC_WMARK_LOW],
> +				zone_idx(preferred_zone), ALLOC_WMARK_LOW))
> +		wake_all_kswapd(order, zonelist, high_zoneidx);
>  
> -	for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx)
> -		wakeup_kswapd(zone, order);
> +	return page;
>  }
>  
>  static inline int
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-27  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-22 14:22 [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2 Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] page allocator: Always wake kswapd when restarting an allocation attempt after direct reclaim failed Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:24   ` [PATCH 1/5 Against 2.6.31.4] " Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:41   ` [PATCH 1/5] " Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 15:49     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26  1:11   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-26  7:10     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27  2:42       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-27 12:27         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use ALLOC_HARDER Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 16:33   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-22 16:37     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23  9:57       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-24  2:03       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-27 15:19         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-25 12:57       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-26  1:15   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order watermarks are being hit Mel Gorman
2009-10-23 17:52   ` Vincent Li
2009-10-23 22:12     ` Vincent Li
2009-10-27 10:38     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] page allocator: Pre-emptively wake kswapd when high-order watermarks are hit Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 19:41   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-23  9:13     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23  9:36       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-23 11:25         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23 11:31           ` Tobias Oetiker
2009-10-23 13:39             ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-10-27 15:26     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ONLY-APPLY-IF-STILL-FAILING Revert 373c0a7e, 8aa7e847: Fix congestion_wait() sync/async vs read/write confusion Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:25   ` Against 2.6.31.4 [PATCH 5/5] " Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 21:49   ` [PATCH 5/5] ONLY-APPLY-IF-STILL-FAILING " Jens Axboe
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-27 10:29     ` Frans Pop
2009-10-22 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2 Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 16:03   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-24  1:52   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-24  6:48     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-24  6:48     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 15:43 ` reinette chatre
2009-10-27 10:40   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27 23:34     ` reinette chatre
2009-10-23  7:31 ` Sven Geggus
2009-10-23 16:58 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-23 21:12   ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-24 13:46     ` Mel LKML
2009-10-28 11:42       ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-28 11:59         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-30 14:23           ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-11-02 20:30             ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-04  2:03               ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-28 12:55         ` Tobi Oetiker
2009-10-24 13:51 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-24 14:02 ` Sven Geggus
2009-10-27 13:27   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26 17:37 ` Tobias Oetiker
2009-10-27 15:36   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26 22:17 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-26 23:45   ` Frans Pop
2009-11-06  6:03 ` Tobias Diedrich
2009-11-06  9:24   ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-06 11:15     ` Tobias Diedrich
2009-11-06  9:24   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091026235032.2F78.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
    --cc=karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mohamed.abbas@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=tobi@oetiker.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox