From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46DD16B004F for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:54:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.75]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n9F1sYgG020561 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:54:35 +0900 Received: from smail (m5 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4416D2AEA82 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:54:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.95]) by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F48345DE4F for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:54:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F213E1800D for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:54:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.106]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98E31DB805E for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:54:32 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: move inc_zone_page_state(NR_ISOLATED) to just isolated place In-Reply-To: <20091013115957.e2871557.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20091009100527.1284.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091013115957.e2871557.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: <20091015105154.C76A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:54:32 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML , linux-mm , Christoph Lameter , stable@kernel.org List-ID: > On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:06:58 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > This patch series is trivial cleanup and fix of page migration. > > > > > > ========================================================== > > > > Christoph pointed out inc_zone_page_state(NR_ISOLATED) should be placed > > in right after isolate_page(). > > The bugfixes are appropriate for 2.6.32 and should be backported into > -stable too, I think. I haven't checked to see how long those bugs > have been present. > > The cleanup is more appropriate for 2.6.33 so I had to switch the order > of these patches. Hopefully the bugfixes were not dependent on the > cleanup. Yes, each patches are independent. [1/3] is cleanup. [2/3] and [3/3] are bugfixes. I'm sorry for lack of prudence of patch order. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org