From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/8] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent()
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:51:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091013135142.8bc4b025.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013134903.66c9682a.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
mem_cgroup_move_parent() calls try_charge first and cancel_charge on failure.
IMHO, charge/uncharge(especially charge) is high cost operation, so we should
avoid it as far as possible.
This patch tries to delay try_charge in mem_cgroup_move_parent() by re-ordering
checks it does.
And this patch renames mem_cgroup_move_account() to __mem_cgroup_move_account(),
changes the return value of __mem_cgroup_move_account() from int to void,
and adds a new wrapper(mem_cgroup_move_account()), which checks whether a @pc
is valid for moving account and calls __mem_cgroup_move_account().
This patch removes the last caller of trylock_page_cgroup(), so removes its
definition too.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
---
include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 7 +---
mm/memcontrol.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
index 4b938d4..b0e4eb1 100644
--- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static inline void ClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
static inline int TestClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \
{ return test_and_clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); }
+TESTPCGFLAG(Locked, LOCK)
+
/* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */
TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
CLEARPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
@@ -86,11 +88,6 @@ static inline void lock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
bit_spin_lock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
}
-static inline int trylock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
-{
- return bit_spin_trylock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
-}
-
static inline void unlock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
{
bit_spin_unlock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f604469..fb20564 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1646,45 +1646,29 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
}
/**
- * mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
+ * __mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
* @pc: page_cgroup of the page.
* @from: mem_cgroup which the page is moved from.
* @to: mem_cgroup which the page is moved to. @from != @to.
*
* The caller must confirm following.
* - page is not on LRU (isolate_page() is useful.)
- *
- * returns 0 at success,
- * returns -EBUSY when lock is busy or "pc" is unstable.
+ * - the pc is locked, used, and ->mem_cgroup points to @from.
*
* This function does "uncharge" from old cgroup but doesn't do "charge" to
* new cgroup. It should be done by a caller.
*/
-static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
{
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *from_mz, *to_mz;
- int nid, zid;
- int ret = -EBUSY;
struct page *page;
VM_BUG_ON(from == to);
VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(pc->page));
-
- nid = page_cgroup_nid(pc);
- zid = page_cgroup_zid(pc);
- from_mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(from, nid, zid);
- to_mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(to, nid, zid);
-
- if (!trylock_page_cgroup(pc))
- return ret;
-
- if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
- goto out;
-
- if (pc->mem_cgroup != from)
- goto out;
+ VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupLocked(pc));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupUsed(pc));
+ VM_BUG_ON(pc->mem_cgroup != from);
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(from))
res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -1705,15 +1689,28 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
css_get(&to->css);
pc->mem_cgroup = to;
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(to, pc, true);
- ret = 0;
-out:
- unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
/*
* We charges against "to" which may not have any tasks. Then, "to"
* can be under rmdir(). But in current implementation, caller of
* this function is just force_empty() and it's garanteed that
* "to" is never removed. So, we don't check rmdir status here.
*/
+}
+
+/*
+ * check whether the @pc is valid for moving account and call
+ * __mem_cgroup_move_account()
+ */
+static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+ struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
+{
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+ lock_page_cgroup(pc);
+ if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) {
+ __mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to);
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
return ret;
}
@@ -1735,38 +1732,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page_cgroup *pc,
if (!pcg)
return -EINVAL;
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ if (!get_page_unless_zero(page))
+ goto out;
+ if (isolate_lru_page(page))
+ goto put;
parent = mem_cgroup_from_cgroup(pcg);
-
-
ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, gfp_mask, &parent, false, page);
if (ret || !parent)
- return ret;
-
- if (!get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto uncharge;
- }
-
- ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
-
- if (ret)
- goto cancel;
+ goto put_back;
ret = mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, child, parent);
-
+ if (!ret)
+ css_put(&parent->css); /* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */
+ else
+ mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent); /* does css_put */
+put_back:
putback_lru_page(page);
- if (!ret) {
- put_page(page);
- /* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */
- css_put(&parent->css);
- return 0;
- }
-
-cancel:
+put:
put_page(page);
-uncharge:
- mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent);
+out:
return ret;
}
--
1.5.6.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-13 4:49 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] memcg: recharge at task move (Oct13) Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-13 4:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] cgroup: introduce cancel_attach() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-15 7:37 ` Paul Menage
2009-10-15 8:50 ` Paul Menage
2009-10-15 11:08 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-13 4:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2009-10-13 4:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] memcg: move memcg_tasklist mutex Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-13 4:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] memcg: add interface to recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-13 4:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] memcg: recharge charges of mapped page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-13 4:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] memcg: avoid oom during recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-13 4:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] memcg: recharge charges of anonymous swap Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-13 4:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] memcg: recharge charges of shmem swap Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-14 7:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] memcg: recharge at task move (Oct13) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 0:27 ` Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091013135142.8bc4b025.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox