linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: add gfp flags for NODEMASK_ALLOC slab allocations
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:01:23 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091009100123.a18f2a15.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0910081422100.676@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

> Objects passed to NODEMASK_ALLOC() are relatively small in size and are
> backed by slab caches that are not of large order, traditionally never
> greater than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER.
> 
> Thus, using GFP_KERNEL for these allocations on large machines when
> CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT > 8 will cause the page allocator to loop endlessly in
> the allocation attempt, each time invoking both direct reclaim or the oom
> killer.
> 
> This is of particular interest when using NODEMASK_ALLOC() from a
> mempolicy context (either directly in mm/mempolicy.c or the mempolicy
> constrained hugetlb allocations) since the oom killer always kills
> current when allocations are constrained by mempolicies.  So for all
> present use cases in the kernel, current would end up being oom killed
> when direct reclaim fails.  That would allow the NODEMASK_ALLOC() to
> succeed but current would have sacrificed itself upon returning.
> 
> This patch adds gfp flags to NODEMASK_ALLOC() to pass to kmalloc() on
> CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT > 8; this parameter is a nop on other configurations.
> All current use cases either directly from hugetlb code or indirectly via
> NODEMASK_SCRATCH() union __GFP_NORETRY to avoid direct reclaim and the
> oom killer when the slab allocator needs to allocate additional pages.
> 
> The side-effect of this change is that all current use cases of either
> NODEMASK_ALLOC() or NODEMASK_SCRATCH() need appropriate -ENOMEM handling
> when the allocation fails (never for CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT <= 8).  All
> current use cases were audited and do have appropriate error handling at
> this time.
> 
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

> ---
>  Andrew, this was written on mmotm-09251435 plus Lee's entire patchset.
> 
>  include/linux/nodemask.h |   21 ++++++++++++---------
>  mm/hugetlb.c             |    5 +++--
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h
> --- a/include/linux/nodemask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h
> @@ -485,15 +485,17 @@ static inline int num_node_state(enum node_states state)
>  #define for_each_online_node(node) for_each_node_state(node, N_ONLINE)
>  
>  /*
> - * For nodemask scrach area.(See CPUMASK_ALLOC() in cpumask.h)
> - * NODEMASK_ALLOC(x, m) allocates an object of type 'x' with the name 'm'.
> + * For nodemask scrach area.
> + * NODEMASK_ALLOC(type, name) allocates an object with a specified type and
> + * name.
>   */
> -#if NODES_SHIFT > 8 /* nodemask_t > 64 bytes */
> -#define NODEMASK_ALLOC(x, m)		x *m = kmalloc(sizeof(*m), GFP_KERNEL)
> -#define NODEMASK_FREE(m)		kfree(m)
> +#if NODES_SHIFT > 8 /* nodemask_t > 256 bytes */
> +#define NODEMASK_ALLOC(type, name, gfp_flags)	\
> +			type *name = kmalloc(sizeof(*name), gfp_flags)
> +#define NODEMASK_FREE(m)			kfree(m)
>  #else
> -#define NODEMASK_ALLOC(x, m)		x _m, *m = &_m
> -#define NODEMASK_FREE(m)		do {} while (0)
> +#define NODEMASK_ALLOC(type, name, gfp_flags)	type _name, *name = &_name
> +#define NODEMASK_FREE(m)			do {} while (0)
>  #endif
>  
>  /* A example struture for using NODEMASK_ALLOC, used in mempolicy. */
> @@ -502,8 +504,9 @@ struct nodemask_scratch {
>  	nodemask_t	mask2;
>  };
>  
> -#define NODEMASK_SCRATCH(x)	\
> -		NODEMASK_ALLOC(struct nodemask_scratch, x)
> +#define NODEMASK_SCRATCH(x)						\
> +			NODEMASK_ALLOC(struct nodemask_scratch, x,	\
> +					GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY)
>  #define NODEMASK_SCRATCH_FREE(x)	NODEMASK_FREE(x)
>  
>  
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ static ssize_t nr_hugepages_store_common(bool obey_mempolicy,
>  	int nid;
>  	unsigned long count;
>  	struct hstate *h;
> -	NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, nodes_allowed);
> +	NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, nodes_allowed, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY);
>  
>  	err = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &count);
>  	if (err)
> @@ -1857,7 +1857,8 @@ static int hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common(bool obey_mempolicy,
>  	proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
>  
>  	if (write) {
> -		NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, nodes_allowed);
> +		NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, nodes_allowed,
> +						GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY);
>  		if (!(obey_mempolicy &&
>  			       init_nodemask_of_mempolicy(nodes_allowed))) {
>  			NODEMASK_FREE(nodes_allowed);
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-09  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-08 16:24 [PATCH 0/12] hugetlb: V10 numa control of persistent huge pages alloc/free Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/12] nodemask: make NODEMASK_ALLOC more general Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:17   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 2/12] hugetlb: rework hstate_next_node_* functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/12] hugetlb: add nodemask arg to huge page alloc, free and surplus adjust fcns Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:32   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 4/12] hugetlb: factor init_nodemask_of_node Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:20   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 5/12] hugetlb: derive huge pages nodes allowed from task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 21:22   ` [patch] mm: add gfp flags for NODEMASK_ALLOC slab allocations David Rientjes
2009-10-09  1:01     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 6/12] hugetlb: add generic definition of NUMA_NO_NODE Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:16   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-08 20:26     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 21:44       ` [patch -mm] acpi: remove NID_INVAL David Rientjes
2009-10-28 14:53         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-29 18:40         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 7/12] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:42   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-09 12:57     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-09 22:10       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-09 13:49     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-09 22:18       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-12 15:41         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-13  2:09           ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 8/12] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for NUMA controls Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 9/12] hugetlb: use only nodes with memory for huge pages Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] mm: clear node in N_HIGH_MEMORY and stop kswapd when all memory is offlined Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:19   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] hugetlb: handle memory hot-plug events Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] hugetlb: offload per node attribute registrations Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091009100123.a18f2a15.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox