linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: coalescing charges per cpu
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:45:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091009041535.GO6818@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091002140343.ae63e932.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-10-02 14:03:43]:

> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> This is a patch for coalescing access to res_counter at charging by
> percpu caching. At charge, memcg charges 64pages and remember it in
> percpu cache. Because it's cache, drain/flush is done if necessary.
> 
> This version uses public percpu area.
>  2 benefits of using public percpu area.
>  1. Sum of stocked charge in the system is limited to # of cpus
>     not to the number of memcg. This shows better synchonization.
>  2. drain code for flush/cpuhotplug is very easy (and quick)
> 
> The most important point of this patch is that we never touch res_counter
> in fast path. The res_counter is system-wide shared counter which is modified
> very frequently. We shouldn't touch it as far as we can for avoiding
> false sharing.
>
> Changelog (new):
>   - rabased onto the latest mmotm
> Changelog (old):
>   - moved charge size check before __GFP_WAIT check for avoiding unnecesary
>   - added asynchronous flush routine.
>   - fixed bugs pointed out by Nishimura-san.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |  126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
>  #include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include "internal.h"
> 
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> @@ -275,6 +276,7 @@ enum charge_type {
>  static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
>  static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
>  static struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> +static void drain_all_stock_async(void);
> 
>  static struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
>  mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid, int zid)
> @@ -1137,6 +1139,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
>  		victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
>  		if (victim == root_mem) {
>  			loop++;
> +			if (loop >= 1)
> +				drain_all_stock_async();
>  			if (loop >= 2) {
>  				/*
>  				 * If we have not been able to reclaim
> @@ -1258,6 +1262,103 @@ done:
>  	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
>  }
> 
> +/* size of first charge trial. "32" comes from vmscan.c's magic value */
> +#define CHARGE_SIZE	(32 * PAGE_SIZE)

Should this then be SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX instead of 32?

> +struct memcg_stock_pcp {
> +	struct mem_cgroup *cached;
> +	int charge;
> +	struct work_struct work;
> +};
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct memcg_stock_pcp, memcg_stock);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_drain_mutex);
> +
> +static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> +{
> +	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	stock = &get_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
> +	if (mem == stock->cached && stock->charge)
> +		stock->charge -= PAGE_SIZE;
> +	else
> +		ret = false;
> +	put_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
> +	return ret;
> +}


Shouldn't consume stock and routines below check for memcg_is_root()?

> +
> +static void drain_stock(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock)
> +{
> +	struct mem_cgroup *old = stock->cached;
> +
> +	if (stock->charge) {
> +		res_counter_uncharge(&old->res, stock->charge);
> +		if (do_swap_account)
> +			res_counter_uncharge(&old->memsw, stock->charge);
> +	}
> +	stock->cached = NULL;
> +	stock->charge = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void drain_local_stock(struct work_struct *dummy)
> +{
> +	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &get_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
> +	drain_stock(stock);
> +	put_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
> +}
> +
> +static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int val)
> +{
> +	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &get_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
> +
> +	if (stock->cached != mem) {
> +		drain_stock(stock);
> +		stock->cached = mem;
> +	}

More comments here would help

> +	stock->charge += val;
> +	put_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
> +}
> +
> +static void drain_all_stock_async(void)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +	/* Contention means someone tries to flush. */
> +	if (!mutex_trylock(&memcg_drain_mutex))
> +		return;
> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
> +		if (work_pending(&stock->work))
> +			continue;
> +		INIT_WORK(&stock->work, drain_local_stock);
> +		schedule_work_on(cpu, &stock->work);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&memcg_drain_mutex);
> +	/* We don't wait for flush_work */
> +}
> +
> +static void drain_all_stock_sync(void)
> +{
> +	/* called when force_empty is called */
> +	mutex_lock(&memcg_drain_mutex);
> +	schedule_on_each_cpu(drain_local_stock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&memcg_drain_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static int __cpuinit memcg_stock_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +					unsigned long action,
> +					void *hcpu)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +	int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
> +	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
> +
> +	if (action != CPU_DEAD)
> +		return NOTIFY_OK;
> +	stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
> +	drain_stock(stock);
> +#endif
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Unlike exported interface, "oom" parameter is added. if oom==true,
>   * oom-killer can be invoked.
> @@ -1269,6 +1370,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struc
>  	struct mem_cgroup *mem, *mem_over_limit;
>  	int nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
>  	struct res_counter *fail_res;
> +	int csize = CHARGE_SIZE;
> 
>  	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))) {
>  		/* Don't account this! */
> @@ -1293,23 +1395,25 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struc
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	VM_BUG_ON(css_is_removed(&mem->css));
> +	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
> +		goto done;
> 
>  	while (1) {
>  		int ret = 0;
>  		unsigned long flags = 0;
> 
> -		if (mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
> -			goto done;
> -		ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &fail_res);
> +		if (consume_stock(mem))
> +			goto charged;
> +
> +		ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->res, csize, &fail_res);
>  		if (likely(!ret)) {
>  			if (!do_swap_account)
>  				break;
> -			ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE,
> -							&fail_res);
> +			ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->memsw, csize, &fail_res);
>  			if (likely(!ret))
>  				break;
>  			/* mem+swap counter fails */
> -			res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
> +			res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, csize);
>  			flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
>  			mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res,
>  									memsw);
> @@ -1318,6 +1422,11 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struc
>  			mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res,
>  									res);
> 
> +		/* reduce request size and retry */
> +		if (csize > PAGE_SIZE) {
> +			csize = PAGE_SIZE;
> +			continue;
> +		}
>  		if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
>  			goto nomem;
> 
> @@ -1347,6 +1456,9 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struc
>  			goto nomem;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	if (csize > PAGE_SIZE)
> +		refill_stock(mem, csize - PAGE_SIZE);
> +charged:
>  	/*
>  	 * Insert ancestor (and ancestor's ancestors), to softlimit RB-tree.
>  	 * if they exceeds softlimit.
> @@ -2463,6 +2575,7 @@ move_account:
>  			goto out;
>  		/* This is for making all *used* pages to be on LRU. */
>  		lru_add_drain_all();
> +		drain_all_stock_sync();
>  		ret = 0;
>  		for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
>  			for (zid = 0; !ret && zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
> @@ -3181,6 +3294,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
>  		root_mem_cgroup = mem;
>  		if (mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init())
>  			goto free_out;
> +		hotcpu_notifier(memcg_stock_cpu_callback, 0);
> 
>  	} else {
>  		parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont->parent);
> 

I tested earlier versions of the patchset and they worked absolutely
fine for me!


-- 
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-09  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-02  4:55 [PATCH 0/2] memcg: improving scalability by reducing lock contention at charge/uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02  5:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: coalescing uncharge at unmap and truncation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02  6:47   ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-10-02  6:53     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-10-02  7:04       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02  7:02     ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: coalescing uncharge at unmap and truncation (fixed coimpile bug) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-08 22:17       ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-08 23:48         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-09  4:01   ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: coalescing uncharge at unmap and truncation Balbir Singh
2009-10-09  4:17     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02  5:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: coalescing charges per cpu KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-08 22:26   ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-08 23:54     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-09  4:15   ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-10-09  4:25     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02  8:53 ` [PATCH 0/2] memcg: improving scalability by reducing lock contention at charge/uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-05  7:18   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-05 10:37 ` Balbir Singh
     [not found] ` <604427e00910091737s52e11ce9p256c95d533dc2837@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-11  2:33   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
     [not found]     ` <604427e00910111134o6f22f0ddg2b87124dd334ec02@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-12 11:38       ` Balbir Singh
2009-10-13  0:29       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
     [not found]         ` <604427e00910121818w71dd4b7dl8781d7f5bc4f7dd9@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-13  1:28           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091009041535.GO6818@balbir.in.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox