From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch 3/3] mm: munlock COW pages on truncation unmap
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:44:36 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006163748.1263.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091005193200.GA13040@cmpxchg.org>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 10:56:55PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > >> Umm..
> > >> I haven't understand this.
> > >>
> > >> (1) unmap_mapping_range() is called twice.
> > >>
> > >> unmap_mapping_range(mapping, new + PAGE_SIZE - 1, 0, 1);
> > >> truncate_inode_pages(mapping, new);
> > >> unmap_mapping_range(mapping, new + PAGE_SIZE - 1, 0, 1);
> > >>
> > >> (2) PG_mlock is turned on from mlock() and vmscan.
> > >> (3) vmscan grab anon_vma, but mlock don't grab anon_vma.
> > >
> > > You are right, I was so focused on the LRU side that I missed an
> > > obvious window here: an _explicit_ mlock can still happen between the
> > > PG_mlocked clearing section and releasing the page.
>
> Okay, so what are the opinions on this? Would you consider my patches
> to fix the most likely issues? Dropping them in favor of looking for
> a complete fix? Revert the warning on freeing PG_mlocked pages?
Honestly, I don't have any good idea. but luckly, we have enough time.
the false-positve warning is not so big problem. then, I prefer looking for
complete solusion.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 21:09 [rfc patch 1/3] mm: always pass mapping in zap_details Johannes Weiner
2009-09-30 21:09 ` [rfc patch 2/3] mm: serialize truncation unmap against try_to_unmap() Johannes Weiner
2009-09-30 21:09 ` [rfc patch 3/3] mm: munlock COW pages on truncation unmap Johannes Weiner
2009-10-02 2:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-02 23:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-10-03 13:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-05 19:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-10-06 1:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-06 7:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091006163748.1263.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox