From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5B4D6B0055 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:23:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Frans Pop Subject: Re: [Bug #14141] order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:23:01 +0200 References: <3onW63eFtRF.A.xXH.oMTxKB@chimera> <200910052334.23833.elendil@planet.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910061223.04293.elendil@planet.nl> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Mel Gorman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Pekka Enberg , Reinette Chatre , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Karol Lewandowski , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tuesday 06 October 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > And the winner is: > > 2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 is first bad commit > > commit 2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 > > Author: David Rientjes > > Date: Tue Jun 16 15:32:56 2009 -0700 > > > > oom: move oom_adj value from task_struct to mm_struct > > > > I'm confident that the bisection is good. The test case was very > > reliable while zooming in on the merge from akpm. > > I doubt it for two reasons: (i) this commit was reverted in 0753ba0 > since 2.6.31-rc7 and is no longer in the kernel, and (ii) these are > GFP_ATOMIC allocations which would be unaffected by oom killer scores. OK. Looks like I have been getting some false "good" results. I've been redoing part of the bisect and am getting close to a new candidate. Will explain further when I have that. Cheers, FJP -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org