From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:37:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091002103755.ba0fbb10.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091002094238.6e1a1e5a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:42:38 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > (2) All vm macros should be defined with ULL suffix. for supporing ~
> > > ==
> > > vm_flags 30 arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c unsigned long vm_flags = vma->vm_flags & ~VM_LOCKED;
> > >
> > > (3) vma_merge()'s vm_flags should be ULL.
> >
> > At first I thought you'd saved me a lot of embarrassment by mentioning
> > those ULL suffixes, I hadn't put them in. But after a quick test of
> > what I thought was going to show a problem without them, no problem.
> > Please would you send me a test program which demonstrates the need
> > for all those ULLs?
> >
> Ah, I'm sorry if I misunderstand C's rule.
>
> There are some places which use ~.
> like
> vm_flags = vma->vm_flags & ~(VM_LOCKED);
>
> ~VM_LOCKED is
> 0xffffdfff or 0xffffffffffffdffff ?
>
> Is my concern.
>
> I tried following function on my old x86 box
> ==
> #define FLAG (0x20)
>
> int foo(unsigned long long x)
> {
> return x & ~FLAG;
> }
> ==
> (returning "int" as "bool")
>
> compile this with gcc -S -O2 (gcc's version is 4.0)
> ==
> foo:
> pushl %ebp
> movl %esp, %ebp
> movl 8(%ebp), %eax
> andl $-33, %eax
> leave
> ret
> ==
> Them, it seems higher bits are ignored for returning bool.
>
Sigh, I seems I don't undestand C language yet..
This one
==
#define FLAG (0x20ULL)
int foo(unsigned long long x)
{
return (x & ~FLAG);
}
==
is compiled as
==
foo:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
movl 8(%ebp), %eax
andl $-33, %eax
leave
ret
==
ULL suffix makes no difference ;)
This one
==
#define FLAG (0x20)
int foo(unsigned long long x)
{
if (x & ~FLAG)
return 1;
return 0;
}
==
foo:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
movl 8(%ebp), %eax
movl 12(%ebp), %edx
andl $-33, %eax
orl %edx, %eax
setne %al
movzbl %al, %eax
leave
ret
seems good.
Hmm. sorry for noise. Maybe I don't understand C's cast rules.
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4AB9A0D6.1090004@crca.org.au>
2009-09-23 20:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-25 8:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25 11:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-25 11:47 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-30 12:02 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-30 13:08 ` swsusp on nommu, was 'Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.' Johannes Weiner
2009-09-30 16:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-09-24 1:05 ` No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25 8:34 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25 8:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25 8:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-25 21:09 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-09-28 2:45 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28 3:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 3:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-28 3:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 4:37 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28 4:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-28 4:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 5:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28 5:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 21:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 21:33 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-28 15:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 16:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-28 21:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-28 21:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-09-29 1:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29 14:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-01 10:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-01 13:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-01 11:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-02 0:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-02 1:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-10-02 2:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091002103755.ba0fbb10.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox