linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/10] memcg: add commentary
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:36:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090930133618.1055e551.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090930114105.66bdcd7a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

> > > + * we never select a memcg which has no memory usage on this zone.
> > > + */
> > I'm sorry if I misunderstand about softlimit implementation, what prevents
> > a memcg which has no memory usage on this zone from being selected ?
> > IIUC, mz->usage_in_excess has a value calculated from res_counter_soft_limit_excess(),
> > which doesn't take account of zone but only calculates "usage - soft_limit".
> > 
> right. But the point is that if memcg has _no_ pages in the zone, memcg is
> not on RB-tree. So, Hmm, How about this ?
Thank you for your clarification.

> ==
> Because this soft-limit tree is maintained per zone, if memcg has little usage on
> this zone, we can expect such memcg won't be found on this per-zone RB-tree.
> ==
> 
I think "never" above is exaggeration a bit, but otherwise it looks good for me.

> I wonder there are something should be improved on this tree management.
I agree.
But I think it would be enough for now to leave it in TODO-list.


Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

> Maybe we should add some per-zone check around here.
> ==
> >                 __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz->mem, mz, mctz);
> >                 excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mz->mem->res);
> >                 /*
> >                  * One school of thought says that we should not add
> >                  * back the node to the tree if reclaim returns 0.
> >                  * But our reclaim could return 0, simply because due
> >                  * to priority we are exposing a smaller subset of
> >                  * memory to reclaim from. Consider this as a longer
> >                  * term TODO.
> >                  */
> >                 /* If excess == 0, no tree ops */
> >                 __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mz->mem, mz, mctz, excess);
> >                 spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
> ==
> Its cost will not be high.
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2009-09-30  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-25  8:17 [RFC][PATCH 0/10] memcg clean up and some fixes for softlimit (Sep25) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:18 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/10] memcg : modifications for softlimit uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/10] memcg : clean up in softlimit charge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/10] memcg: reorganize memcontrol.c KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/10] memcg: add memcg charge cancel KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/10] memcg: clean up percpu statistics access KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/10] memcg: remove unsued macros KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/10] memcg clean up and some fixes for softlimit (Sep25) Balbir Singh
2009-09-25  8:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/10] memcg: replace cont with cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/10] memcg: clean up charge/uncharge anon KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29  0:24   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-09-29  1:26     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29  2:18       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-09-29  3:03         ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-09-29  3:14           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/10] memcg: clean up perzone stat KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-25  8:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] memcg: add commentary KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-30  2:21   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-09-30  2:41     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-30  4:36       ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090930133618.1055e551.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox