From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] memcg: some modification to softlimit under hierarchical memory reclaim.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:01:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090929150141.0e672290.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
No major changes in this patch for 3 weeks.
While testing, I found a few css->refcnt bug in softlimit.(and posted patches)
But it seems no more (easy) ones.
Andrew, this patch modifies bahavior of memcg's softlimit when it is used
under memcg's hierarchical memory management. I think this is a right way but
don't think current behavior is buggy.
plz take this as for better memcg's behavior.
This patch is based on
mmotm-Sep28 +
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125412897121988&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125419390519405&w=2
In above. "[BUGFIX][PATCH][rc1] memcg: fix refcnt goes to minus" is a bugfix.
==
This patch clean up/fixes for memcg's uncharge soft limit path.
Problems:
Now, res_counter_charge()/uncharge() handles softlimit information at
charge/uncharge and softlimit-check is done when event counter per memcg
goes over limit. Now, event counter per memcg is updated only when
memory usage is over soft limit. Here, considering hierarchical memcg
management, ancesotors should be taken care of.
Now, ancerstors(hierarchy) are handled in charge() but not in uncharge().
This is not good.
Prolems:
1. memcg's event counter incremented only when softlimit hits. That's bad.
It makes event counter hard to be reused for other purpose.
2. At uncharge, only the lowest level rescounter is handled. This is bug.
Because ancesotor's event counter is not incremented, children should
take care of them.
3. res_counter_uncharge()'s 3rd argument is NULL in most case.
ops under res_counter->lock should be small. No "if" sentense is better.
Fixes:
* Removed soft_limit_xx poitner and checks in charge and uncharge.
Do-check-only-when-necessary scheme works enough well without them.
* make event-counter of memcg incremented at every charge/uncharge.
(per-cpu area will be accessed soon anyway)
* All ancestors are checked at soft-limit-check. This is necessary because
ancesotor's event counter may never be modified. Then, they should be
checked at the same time.
Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/res_counter.h | 6 --
kernel/res_counter.c | 18 ------
mm/memcontrol.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
Index: mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28/kernel/res_counter.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28.orig/kernel/res_counter.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28/kernel/res_counter.c
@@ -37,27 +37,17 @@ int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res
}
int res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
- struct res_counter **limit_fail_at,
- struct res_counter **soft_limit_fail_at)
+ struct res_counter **limit_fail_at)
{
int ret;
unsigned long flags;
struct res_counter *c, *u;
*limit_fail_at = NULL;
- if (soft_limit_fail_at)
- *soft_limit_fail_at = NULL;
local_irq_save(flags);
for (c = counter; c != NULL; c = c->parent) {
spin_lock(&c->lock);
ret = res_counter_charge_locked(c, val);
- /*
- * With soft limits, we return the highest ancestor
- * that exceeds its soft limit
- */
- if (soft_limit_fail_at &&
- !res_counter_soft_limit_check_locked(c))
- *soft_limit_fail_at = c;
spin_unlock(&c->lock);
if (ret < 0) {
*limit_fail_at = c;
@@ -85,8 +75,7 @@ void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct
counter->usage -= val;
}
-void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
- bool *was_soft_limit_excess)
+void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct res_counter *c;
@@ -94,9 +83,6 @@ void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_cou
local_irq_save(flags);
for (c = counter; c != NULL; c = c->parent) {
spin_lock(&c->lock);
- if (was_soft_limit_excess)
- *was_soft_limit_excess =
- !res_counter_soft_limit_check_locked(c);
res_counter_uncharge_locked(c, val);
spin_unlock(&c->lock);
}
Index: mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28/include/linux/res_counter.h
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28.orig/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -114,8 +114,7 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter
int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val);
int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
- unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at,
- struct res_counter **soft_limit_at);
+ unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
/*
* uncharge - tell that some portion of the resource is released
@@ -128,8 +127,7 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge(stru
*/
void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
-void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
- bool *was_soft_limit_excess);
+void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
static inline bool res_counter_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt)
{
Index: mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.31-Sep28/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -353,16 +353,6 @@ __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_
}
static void
-mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
-{
- spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
- __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mem, mz, mctz);
- spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
-}
-
-static void
mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
@@ -392,34 +382,40 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(
static void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
{
- unsigned long long prev_usage_in_excess, new_usage_in_excess;
- bool updated_tree = false;
+ unsigned long long new_usage_in_excess;
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz;
-
- mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, page_to_nid(page), page_zonenum(page));
+ int nid = page_to_nid(page);
+ int zid = page_zonenum(page);
mctz = soft_limit_tree_from_page(page);
/*
- * We do updates in lazy mode, mem's are removed
- * lazily from the per-zone, per-node rb tree
+ * Necessary to update all ancestors when hierarchy is used.
+ * because their event counter is not touched.
*/
- prev_usage_in_excess = mz->usage_in_excess;
-
- new_usage_in_excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mem->res);
- if (prev_usage_in_excess) {
- mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mem, mz, mctz);
- updated_tree = true;
- }
- if (!new_usage_in_excess)
- goto done;
- mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mem, mz, mctz);
-
-done:
- if (updated_tree) {
- spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
- mz->usage_in_excess = new_usage_in_excess;
- spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
+ for (; mem; mem = parent_mem_cgroup(mem)) {
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
+ new_usage_in_excess =
+ res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mem->res);
+ /*
+ * We have to update the tree if mz is on RB-tree or
+ * mem is over its softlimit.
+ */
+ if (new_usage_in_excess || mz->on_tree) {
+ spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
+ /* if on-tree, remove it */
+ if (mz->on_tree)
+ __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mem, mz, mctz);
+ /*
+ * if over soft limit, insert again. mz->usage_in_excess
+ * will be updated properly.
+ */
+ if (new_usage_in_excess)
+ __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mem, mz, mctz);
+ else
+ mz->usage_in_excess = 0;
+ spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
+ }
}
}
@@ -1271,9 +1267,9 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struc
gfp_t gfp_mask, struct mem_cgroup **memcg,
bool oom, struct page *page)
{
- struct mem_cgroup *mem, *mem_over_limit, *mem_over_soft_limit;
+ struct mem_cgroup *mem, *mem_over_limit;
int nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
- struct res_counter *fail_res, *soft_fail_res = NULL;
+ struct res_counter *fail_res;
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))) {
/* Don't account this! */
@@ -1305,17 +1301,16 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struc
if (mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
goto done;
- ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &fail_res,
- &soft_fail_res);
+ ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &fail_res);
if (likely(!ret)) {
if (!do_swap_account)
break;
ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE,
- &fail_res, NULL);
+ &fail_res);
if (likely(!ret))
break;
/* mem+swap counter fails */
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res,
memsw);
@@ -1354,16 +1349,11 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struc
}
}
/*
- * Insert just the ancestor, we should trickle down to the correct
- * cgroup for reclaim, since the other nodes will be below their
- * soft limit
- */
- if (soft_fail_res) {
- mem_over_soft_limit =
- mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(soft_fail_res, res);
- if (mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(mem_over_soft_limit))
- mem_cgroup_update_tree(mem_over_soft_limit, page);
- }
+ * Insert ancestor (and ancestor's ancestors), to softlimit RB-tree.
+ * if they exceeds softlimit.
+ */
+ if (mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(mem))
+ mem_cgroup_update_tree(mem, page);
done:
return 0;
nomem:
@@ -1438,10 +1428,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(s
if (unlikely(PageCgroupUsed(pc))) {
unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
if (do_swap_account)
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE,
- NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
}
css_put(&mem->css);
return;
@@ -1520,7 +1509,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struc
goto out;
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(from))
- res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE);
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(from, pc, false);
page = pc->page;
@@ -1540,7 +1529,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struc
}
if (do_swap_account && !mem_cgroup_is_root(from))
- res_counter_uncharge(&from->memsw, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&from->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
css_put(&from->css);
css_get(&to->css);
@@ -1611,9 +1600,9 @@ uncharge:
css_put(&parent->css);
/* uncharge if move fails */
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(parent)) {
- res_counter_uncharge(&parent->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&parent->res, PAGE_SIZE);
if (do_swap_account)
- res_counter_uncharge(&parent->memsw, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&parent->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
}
return ret;
}
@@ -1804,8 +1793,7 @@ __mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(struct
* calling css_tryget
*/
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
- res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, PAGE_SIZE,
- NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
mem_cgroup_swap_statistics(memcg, false);
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
}
@@ -1832,9 +1820,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_cancel_charge_swapin(str
if (!mem)
return;
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
if (do_swap_account)
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
}
css_put(&mem->css);
}
@@ -1849,7 +1837,6 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page
struct page_cgroup *pc;
struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL;
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
- bool soft_limit_excess = false;
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return NULL;
@@ -1889,10 +1876,10 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page
}
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &soft_limit_excess);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
if (do_swap_account &&
(ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT))
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
}
if (ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT)
mem_cgroup_swap_statistics(mem, true);
@@ -1909,7 +1896,7 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
- if (soft_limit_excess && mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(mem))
+ if (mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(mem))
mem_cgroup_update_tree(mem, page);
/* at swapout, this memcg will be accessed to record to swap */
if (ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT)
@@ -1987,7 +1974,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(swp_entry_
* This memcg can be obsolete one. We avoid calling css_tryget
*/
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
- res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
+ res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
mem_cgroup_swap_statistics(memcg, false);
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 6:01 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-09-29 6:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: reduce check for softlimit excess KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29 6:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: some modification to softlimit under hierarchical memory reclaim Balbir Singh
2009-09-29 7:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29 7:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29 9:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-29 11:13 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-29 17:06 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090929150141.0e672290.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox