From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5346B00A6 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:21:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:21:27 +0100 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V3 Message-ID: <20090922132126.GC25965@csn.ul.ie> References: <1253624054-10882-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1253624054-10882-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nick Piggin , Pekka Enberg , Christoph Lameter Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, sachinp@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo , Benjamin Herrenschmidt List-ID: On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:54:11PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > Changelog since V2 > o Turned out that allocating per-cpu areas for node ids on ppc64 just > wasn't stable. This series statically declares the per-node data. This > wastes memory but it appears to work. > > Currently SLQB is not allowed to be configured on PPC and S390 machines as > CPUs can belong to memoryless nodes. SLQB does not deal with this very well > and crashes reliably. > GACK. Sorry about the 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 problem. There are only three patches in this set. I dropped the last patch which was related to the SLQB corruption problem because it didn't appear to help and didn't fix up the number. Sorry. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org