From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/11]memcg: reduce res_counter_soft_limit_excess
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:52:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090918175222.d44a5929.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090918174757.672f1e8e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
In charge/uncharge/reclaim path, usage_in_excess is calculated repeatedly and
it takes res_counter's spin_lock every time.
This patch removes unnecessary calls for res_count_soft_limit_excess.
Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: mmotm-2.6.31-Sep17/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.31-Sep17.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.31-Sep17/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -313,7 +313,8 @@ soft_limit_tree_from_page(struct page *p
static void
__mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
+ struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz,
+ unsigned long long new_usage_in_excess)
{
struct rb_node **p = &mctz->rb_root.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
@@ -322,7 +323,9 @@ __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_
if (mz->on_tree)
return;
- mz->usage_in_excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mem->res);
+ mz->usage_in_excess = new_usage_in_excess;
+ if (!mz->usage_in_excess)
+ return;
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
mz_node = rb_entry(parent, struct mem_cgroup_per_zone,
@@ -382,7 +385,7 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(
static void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
{
- unsigned long long new_usage_in_excess;
+ unsigned long long excess;
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz;
int nid = page_to_nid(page);
@@ -395,25 +398,21 @@ static void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struc
*/
for (; mem; mem = parent_mem_cgroup(mem)) {
mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
- new_usage_in_excess =
- res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mem->res);
+ excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mem->res);
/*
* We have to update the tree if mz is on RB-tree or
* mem is over its softlimit.
*/
- if (new_usage_in_excess || mz->on_tree) {
+ if (excess || mz->on_tree) {
spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
/* if on-tree, remove it */
if (mz->on_tree)
__mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mem, mz, mctz);
/*
- * if over soft limit, insert again. mz->usage_in_excess
- * will be updated properly.
+ * Insert again. mz->usage_in_excess will be updated.
+ * If excess is 0, no tree ops.
*/
- if (new_usage_in_excess)
- __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mem, mz, mctz);
- else
- mz->usage_in_excess = 0;
+ __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mem, mz, mctz, excess);
spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
}
}
@@ -2220,6 +2219,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl
unsigned long reclaimed;
int loop = 0;
struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz;
+ unsigned long long excess;
if (order > 0)
return 0;
@@ -2271,9 +2271,8 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl
break;
} while (1);
}
- mz->usage_in_excess =
- res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mz->mem->res);
__mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz->mem, mz, mctz);
+ excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mz->mem->res);
/*
* One school of thought says that we should not add
* back the node to the tree if reclaim returns 0.
@@ -2282,8 +2281,8 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl
* memory to reclaim from. Consider this as a longer
* term TODO.
*/
- if (mz->usage_in_excess)
- __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mz->mem, mz, mctz);
+ /* If excess == 0, no tree ops */
+ __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mz->mem, mz, mctz, excess);
spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
css_put(&mz->mem->css);
loop++;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-18 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 8:39 [RFC][PATCH 0/4][mmotm] memcg: reduce lock contention v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-09 8:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4][mmotm] memcg: soft limit clean up KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <661de9470909090410t160454a2k658c980b92d11612@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-10 0:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-09 8:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4][mmotm] clean up charge path of softlimit KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-09 8:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4][mmotm] memcg: batched uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-09 8:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4][mmotm] memcg: coalescing charge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-12 4:58 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-09-15 0:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-09 20:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4][mmotm] memcg: reduce lock contention v3 Balbir Singh
2009-09-10 0:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-10 5:18 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-18 8:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/11][mmotm] memcg: patch dump (Sep/18) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 8:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/11] memcg: clean up softlimit uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 8:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-09-18 8:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/11] memcg: coalescing uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 8:54 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/11] memcg: coalescing charge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 8:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/11] memcg: clean up cancel charge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 8:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/11] memcg: cleaun up percpu statistics KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 8:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/11] memcg: rename from_cont to from_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 9:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/11]memcg: remove unused macro and adds commentary KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 9:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/11]memcg: clean up zonestat funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11][mmotm] memcg: clean up percpu and more commentary for soft limit KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 9:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11][mmotm] memcg: more commentary and clean up KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18 10:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/11][mmotm] memcg: patch dump (Sep/18) Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090918175222.d44a5929.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox