From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: memcg merge for 2.6.32 (was Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:58:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916165819.b8843f36.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090916073727.GP4846@balbir.in.ibm.com>
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:07:27 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2009-09-15 16:15:35]:
>
> >
> > memcg-remove-the-overhead-associated-with-the-root-cgroup.patch
> > memcg-remove-the-overhead-associated-with-the-root-cgroup-fix.patch
> > memcg-remove-the-overhead-associated-with-the-root-cgroup-fix-2.patch
> > #memcg-add-comments-explaining-memory-barriers.patch: needs update (Balbir)
> > memcg-add-comments-explaining-memory-barriers.patch
> > memcg-add-comments-explaining-memory-barriers-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-documentation-v9.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-interface-v9.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-organize-cgroups-v9.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-organize-cgroups-v9-fix.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-refactor-reclaim-flags-v9.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-reclaim-on-contention-v9.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-reclaim-on-contention-v9-fix.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-reclaim-on-contention-v9-fix-softlimit-css-refcnt-handling.patch
> > memory-controller-soft-limit-reclaim-on-contention-v9-fix-softlimit-css-refcnt-handling-fix.patch
> > memcg-improve-resource-counter-scalability.patch
> > memcg-improve-resource-counter-scalability-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> > memcg-improve-resource-counter-scalability-v5.patch
> > memcg-show-swap-usage-in-stat-file.patch
> > memcg-show-swap-usage-in-stat-file-fix.patch
> >
> > Merge after checking with Balbir
>
>
> I think these are ready for merging, I'll let Kame and Daisuke comment
> on it more.
While testing memcg, I feel that only I and Balbir and Nishimura are heavy
testers of memcg in mmotm. Because Nishimura's test is very good, I think
we could get good quality to some extent.
Then, I think it's time to move to -rc for getting wider testers.
But Balbir, soft-limit is a difficult thing. plz keep checking.
> The resource counter scalability patch is the most
> important patch in the series.
>
plz don't call it as resource counter scalability patch ;)
It just skips resoruce_counter, resource_counter itself is still slow.
root-cgroup-memcg-scalability patch is good name.
I'll post other-cgroup-memcg-scalability patch series when it seems ready.
It's what I need but not for 2.6.32.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-15 23:15 2.6.32 -mm merge plans Andrew Morton
2009-09-16 3:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-09-16 4:14 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-16 8:33 ` David Härdeman
2009-09-16 15:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-16 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-16 7:37 ` memcg merge for 2.6.32 (was Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans) Balbir Singh
2009-09-16 7:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-09-16 7:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-09-16 8:45 ` stack limits [was Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans] Pavel Machek
2009-09-16 9:42 ` hwpoison fixes was Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans Andi Kleen
2009-09-17 20:15 ` cgrooups && " Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-17 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-17 21:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-17 20:32 ` do_wait() changes " Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-17 20:46 ` tracehooks " Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-17 21:56 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090916165819.b8843f36.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox