From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8C5A6B004F for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:52:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n846qScN013597 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:52:28 +0900 Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7359B45DE5D for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:52:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FDC45DE65 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:52:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB981DB8048 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:52:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.104]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9068E1DB803C for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:52:27 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:50:29 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [mmotm][experimental][PATCH] coalescing charge Message-Id: <20090904155029.ef544d5f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090904154050.25873aa5.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> References: <20090902093438.eed47a57.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090902134114.b6f1a04d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090902182923.c6d98fd6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090903141727.ccde7e91.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090904131835.ac2b8cc8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090904141157.4640ec1e.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090904142143.15ffcb53.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090904142654.08dd159f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090904154050.25873aa5.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Daisuke Nishimura Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" List-ID: On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:40:50 +0900 Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:26:54 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:21:43 +0900 > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:11:57 +0900 > > > Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > > > > > > It looks basically good. I'll do some tests with all patches applied. > > > > > > > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > > > > it seems that these patches make rmdir stall again... > > > > This batched charge patch seems not to be the (only) suspect, though. > > > > > > > Ouch, no probelm with the latest mmotm ? I think this charge-uncharge-offload > > > patch set doesn't use css_set()/get()... > > > Hm, softlimit related parts ? > > > > hmm, these patches(including softlimit cleanup) seems not to be guilt. > Current(I'm using mmotm-2009-08-27-16-51) mmotm seems to be broken about memcg's rmdir. > > I must admit I've not tested mmotm for several months because I have been working > on stabilizing mainline for a long time... > > > Ah, one more question. What memory.usage_in_bytes shows in that case ? > > If not zero, charge/uncharge coalescing is guilty. > > > usage_in_bytes is 0. > I've confirmed by crash command that the mem_cgroup has extra ref counts. > > I'll dig more.. > Ok, then, I and you see different problem... Hmm..css refcnt leak. I'll dig, too. I hope we can catch it before sneaking into mainline. Thanks, -Kame > > Thanks, > Daisuke Nishimura. > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org