From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Vincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vsmcan: check shrink_active_list() sc->isolate_pages() return value.
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:43:23 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901094157.1A80.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090901091249.dcd3a8d1.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop>
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
> Vincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:54:01 -0700
> > > Vincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > > commit 5343daceec (If sc->isolate_pages() return 0...) make shrink_inactive_list handle
> > > > sc->isolate_pages() return value properly. Add similar proper return value check for
> > > > shrink_active_list() sc->isolate_pages().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca>
> > > Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > You should have write down your patch's effect clearly
> > > in changelog although it's easy. ;-)
> >
> > Yes, I should have. This patch is inspired by Kosaki's patch, I
> > thought mentioning that commit would make this patch as follow-up work and
> > changelog clear enough. Would following changelog ok?
> >
> > ----
> > Add proper return value check for shrink_active_list()
> > sc->isolate_pages().
> >
> > When "nr_taken == 0"
> > 1: nr_scan related statistics should still be caculated.
> > 2: jump to the end of function and release zone->lru_lock.
>
> It looks good than old.
> In fact, What I wanted is your patch impact.
>
> For example,
> ----
> If we can't isolate pages from LRU list,
> we don't have to account page movement, either.
> Already, in commit 5343daceec, KOSAKI did it about shrink_inactive_list.
>
> This patch removes unnecessary overhead of page accouting
> and locking in shrink_active_list as follow-up work of commit 5343daceec.
> ---
Vincent, can you please resubmit the patch with new description?
Plus, You can add my reviewed-by sign too.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 22:54 Vincent Li
2009-08-31 23:29 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-01 0:01 ` Vincent Li
2009-09-01 0:12 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-01 0:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-09-01 4:56 ` Vincent Li
2009-08-31 23:42 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-01 1:56 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090901094157.1A80.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=macli@brc.ubc.ca \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox