From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][preview] memcg: reduce lock contention at uncharge by batching
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:42:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825174240.f925d924.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825082526.GB29572@balbir.in.ibm.com>
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:55:26 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-08-25 11:25:47]:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a preview of a patch for reduce lock contention for memcg->res_counter.
> > This makes series of uncharge in batch and reduce critical lock contention in
> > res_counter. This is still under developement and based on 2.6.31-rc7.
> > I'll rebase this onto mmotm if I'm ready.
> >
> > I have only 8cpu(4core/2socket) system now. no significant speed up but good lock_stat.
> >
>
>
> I'll test this on a 24 way that I have and check. I think these
> patches + resource counter per cpu locking should give good results.
>
Thank you.
yes. I'm trying re-considering res_counter-percpu, too.
But, hmm, accuracy of counter trade-off is our final trouble if we select it.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-25 2:25 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-25 2:29 ` [RFC][preview] [patch 1/2] memcg: batched uncharge base KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-25 8:07 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-08-25 8:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-25 2:31 ` [RFC][preview][patch 2/2] memcg: uncharge at truncate/unmap in batched manner KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-25 8:25 ` [RFC][preview] memcg: reduce lock contention at uncharge by batching Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 8:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-08-26 1:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26 5:25 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-08-26 6:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090825174240.f925d924.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox