From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC][preview] [patch 1/2] memcg: batched uncharge base
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:29:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825112919.259ab97c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825112547.c2692965.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
In massive parallel enviroment, res_counter can be a performance bottleneck.
This patch is a trial for reducing lock contention in memcg.
One strong techinque to reduce lock contention is reducing calls themselves by
do some amount of calls into a call, in batch.
Considering charge/uncharge chatacteristic,
- charge is done one by one via demand-paging.
- uncharge is done by
- in continuous call at munmap, truncate, exit, execve...
- one by one via vmscan/paging.
It seems we have a chance to batched-uncharge.
This patch is a base patch for batched uncharge. For avoiding
scattering memcg's structure as argument, this patch adds memcg batch uncharge
information to the task. please see start/end usage in next patch.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 12 ++++++++++
include/linux/sched.h | 8 +++++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.31-rc7/include/linux/memcontrol.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31-rc7.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc7/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(s
extern void mem_cgroup_del_lru(struct page *page);
extern void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page,
enum lru_list from, enum lru_list to);
+
+extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_batch_start(void);
+extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_batch_end(void);
+
extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page);
extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page);
extern int mem_cgroup_shmem_charge_fallback(struct page *page,
@@ -148,6 +152,14 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_cancel_cha
{
}
+static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_batch_start(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_batch_start(void)
+{
+}
+
static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
{
}
Index: linux-2.6.31-rc7/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31-rc7.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc7/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1500,6 +1500,7 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page
struct page_cgroup *pc;
struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL;
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
+ struct memcg_batch_info *batch = NULL;
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return NULL;
@@ -1537,10 +1538,25 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page
default:
break;
}
+ if (current->batch_memcg.batch_mode)
+ batch = ¤t->batch_memcg;
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
- if (do_swap_account && (ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT))
- res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (!batch || batch->memcg != mem) {
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (do_swap_account &&
+ (ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT))
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (batch) {
+ batch->memcg = mem;
+ css_get(&mem->css);
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* instead of modifing res_counter, remember it */
+ batch->nr_pages += PAGE_SIZE;
+ if (do_swap_account &&
+ (ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT))
+ batch->nr_memsw += PAGE_SIZE;
+ }
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(mem, pc, false);
ClearPageCgroupUsed(pc);
@@ -1582,6 +1598,35 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(stru
__mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(page, MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE);
}
+void mem_cgroup_uncharge_batch_start(void)
+{
+ VM_BUG_ON(current->batch_memcg.batch_mode);
+ current->batch_memcg.batch_mode = 1;
+ current->batch_memcg.memcg = NULL;
+ current->batch_memcg.nr_pages = 0;
+ current->batch_memcg.nr_memsw = 0;
+}
+
+void mem_cgroup_uncharge_batch_end(void)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *mem;
+
+ VM_BUG_ON(!current->batch_memcg.batch_mode);
+ current->batch_memcg.batch_mode = 0;
+
+ mem = current->batch_memcg.memcg;
+ if (!mem)
+ return;
+ if (current->batch_memcg.nr_pages)
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res,
+ current->batch_memcg.nr_pages);
+ if (current->batch_memcg.nr_memsw)
+ res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw,
+ current->batch_memcg.nr_memsw);
+ /* we got css's refcnt */
+ cgroup_release_and_wakeup_rmdir(&mem->css);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
/*
* called after __delete_from_swap_cache() and drop "page" account.
Index: linux-2.6.31-rc7/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31-rc7.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc7/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1480,6 +1480,14 @@ struct task_struct {
/* bitmask of trace recursion */
unsigned long trace_recursion;
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
+ /* For implicit argument for batched uncharge */
+ struct memcg_batch_info {
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+ int batch_mode;
+ unsigned long nr_pages, nr_memsw;
+ } batch_memcg;
+#endif
};
/* Future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's cpus_allowed. */
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-25 2:25 [RFC][preview] memcg: reduce lock contention at uncharge by batching KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-25 2:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-08-25 8:07 ` [RFC][preview] [patch 1/2] memcg: batched uncharge base Daisuke Nishimura
2009-08-25 8:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-25 2:31 ` [RFC][preview][patch 2/2] memcg: uncharge at truncate/unmap in batched manner KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-25 8:25 ` [RFC][preview] memcg: reduce lock contention at uncharge by batching Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 8:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26 1:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26 5:25 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-08-26 6:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090825112919.259ab97c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox