From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Dike, Jeffrey G" <jeffrey.g.dike@intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH -v2 changelog updated] mm: do batched scans for mem_cgroup
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:27:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090821072743.GA1808@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c262360908202055u2744879cic989e007867d0599@mail.gmail.com>
For mem_cgroup, shrink_zone() may call shrink_list() with nr_to_scan=1,
in which case shrink_list() _still_ calls isolate_pages() with the much
larger SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. It effectively scales up the inactive list
scan rate by up to 32 times.
For example, with 16k inactive pages and DEF_PRIORITY=12, (16k >> 12)=4.
So when shrink_zone() expects to scan 4 pages in the active/inactive
list, the active list will be scanned 4 pages, while the inactive list
will be (over) scanned SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX=32 pages in effect. And that
could break the balance between the two lists.
It can further impact the scan of anon active list, due to the anon
active/inactive ratio rebalance logic in balance_pgdat()/shrink_zone():
inactive anon list over scanned => inactive_anon_is_low() == TRUE
=> shrink_active_list()
=> active anon list over scanned
So the end result may be
- anon inactive => over scanned
- anon active => over scanned (maybe not as much)
- file inactive => over scanned
- file active => under scanned (relatively)
The accesses to nr_saved_scan are not lock protected and so not 100%
accurate, however we can tolerate small errors and the resulted small
imbalanced scan rates between zones.
CC: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 6 +++++-
mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
mm/vmscan.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- linux.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h 2009-08-21 15:02:50.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/include/linux/mmzone.h 2009-08-21 15:03:25.000000000 +0800
@@ -269,6 +269,11 @@ struct zone_reclaim_stat {
*/
unsigned long recent_rotated[2];
unsigned long recent_scanned[2];
+
+ /*
+ * accumulated for batching
+ */
+ unsigned long nr_saved_scan[NR_LRU_LISTS];
};
struct zone {
@@ -323,7 +328,6 @@ struct zone {
spinlock_t lru_lock;
struct zone_lru {
struct list_head list;
- unsigned long nr_saved_scan; /* accumulated for batching */
} lru[NR_LRU_LISTS];
struct zone_reclaim_stat reclaim_stat;
--- linux.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2009-08-21 15:03:15.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/vmscan.c 2009-08-21 15:03:25.000000000 +0800
@@ -1521,6 +1521,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, st
enum lru_list l;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
unsigned long swap_cluster_max = sc->swap_cluster_max;
+ struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
int noswap = 0;
/* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */
@@ -1540,12 +1541,9 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, st
scan >>= priority;
scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
}
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
- nr[l] = nr_scan_try_batch(scan,
- &zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan,
- swap_cluster_max);
- else
- nr[l] = scan;
+ nr[l] = nr_scan_try_batch(scan,
+ &reclaim_stat->nr_saved_scan[l],
+ swap_cluster_max);
}
while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
@@ -2128,6 +2126,7 @@ static void shrink_all_zones(unsigned lo
{
struct zone *zone;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
+ struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat;
for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
enum lru_list l;
@@ -2144,11 +2143,14 @@ static void shrink_all_zones(unsigned lo
l == LRU_ACTIVE_FILE))
continue;
- zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan += (lru_pages >> prio) + 1;
- if (zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan >= nr_pages || pass > 3) {
+ reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
+ reclaim_stat->nr_saved_scan[l] +=
+ (lru_pages >> prio) + 1;
+ if (reclaim_stat->nr_saved_scan[l]
+ >= nr_pages || pass > 3) {
unsigned long nr_to_scan;
- zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan = 0;
+ reclaim_stat->nr_saved_scan[l] = 0;
nr_to_scan = min(nr_pages, lru_pages);
nr_reclaimed += shrink_list(l, nr_to_scan, zone,
sc, prio);
--- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c 2009-08-21 15:02:50.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c 2009-08-21 15:03:25.000000000 +0800
@@ -3734,7 +3734,7 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_
zone_pcp_init(zone);
for_each_lru(l) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->lru[l].list);
- zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan = 0;
+ zone->reclaim_stat.nr_saved_scan[l] = 0;
}
zone->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[0] = 0;
zone->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[1] = 0;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 2:49 [PATCH] " Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 2:52 ` [PATCH] mm: make nr_scan_try_batch() more safe on races Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 3:17 ` [RFC][PATCH] mm: remove unnecessary loop inside shrink_inactive_list() Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 11:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-21 11:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-27 0:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-20 3:13 ` [PATCH] mm: do batched scans for mem_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 4:05 ` [PATCH -v2] " Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 4:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 5:16 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-21 1:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 1:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 11:01 ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-20 11:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 12:13 ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-20 12:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 3:55 ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-21 7:27 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-08-21 10:57 ` [PATCH -v2 changelog updated] " KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090821072743.GA1808@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=jeffrey.g.dike@intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox