linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Dike, Jeffrey G" <jeffrey.g.dike@intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH -v2 changelog updated] mm: do batched scans for mem_cgroup
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:27:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090821072743.GA1808@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c262360908202055u2744879cic989e007867d0599@mail.gmail.com>

For mem_cgroup, shrink_zone() may call shrink_list() with nr_to_scan=1,
in which case shrink_list() _still_ calls isolate_pages() with the much
larger SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX.  It effectively scales up the inactive list
scan rate by up to 32 times.

For example, with 16k inactive pages and DEF_PRIORITY=12, (16k >> 12)=4.
So when shrink_zone() expects to scan 4 pages in the active/inactive
list, the active list will be scanned 4 pages, while the inactive list
will be (over) scanned SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX=32 pages in effect. And that
could break the balance between the two lists.

It can further impact the scan of anon active list, due to the anon
active/inactive ratio rebalance logic in balance_pgdat()/shrink_zone():

inactive anon list over scanned => inactive_anon_is_low() == TRUE
                                => shrink_active_list()
                                => active anon list over scanned

So the end result may be

- anon inactive  => over scanned
- anon active    => over scanned (maybe not as much)
- file inactive  => over scanned
- file active    => under scanned (relatively)

The accesses to nr_saved_scan are not lock protected and so not 100%
accurate, however we can tolerate small errors and the resulted small
imbalanced scan rates between zones.

CC: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h |    6 +++++-
 mm/page_alloc.c        |    2 +-
 mm/vmscan.c            |   20 +++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h	2009-08-21 15:02:50.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/include/linux/mmzone.h	2009-08-21 15:03:25.000000000 +0800
@@ -269,6 +269,11 @@ struct zone_reclaim_stat {
 	 */
 	unsigned long		recent_rotated[2];
 	unsigned long		recent_scanned[2];
+
+	/*
+	 * accumulated for batching
+	 */
+	unsigned long		nr_saved_scan[NR_LRU_LISTS];
 };
 
 struct zone {
@@ -323,7 +328,6 @@ struct zone {
 	spinlock_t		lru_lock;	
 	struct zone_lru {
 		struct list_head list;
-		unsigned long nr_saved_scan;	/* accumulated for batching */
 	} lru[NR_LRU_LISTS];
 
 	struct zone_reclaim_stat reclaim_stat;
--- linux.orig/mm/vmscan.c	2009-08-21 15:03:15.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/vmscan.c	2009-08-21 15:03:25.000000000 +0800
@@ -1521,6 +1521,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, st
 	enum lru_list l;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
 	unsigned long swap_cluster_max = sc->swap_cluster_max;
+	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
 	int noswap = 0;
 
 	/* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */
@@ -1540,12 +1541,9 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, st
 			scan >>= priority;
 			scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
 		}
-		if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
-			nr[l] = nr_scan_try_batch(scan,
-						  &zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan,
-						  swap_cluster_max);
-		else
-			nr[l] = scan;
+		nr[l] = nr_scan_try_batch(scan,
+					  &reclaim_stat->nr_saved_scan[l],
+					  swap_cluster_max);
 	}
 
 	while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
@@ -2128,6 +2126,7 @@ static void shrink_all_zones(unsigned lo
 {
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
+	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat;
 
 	for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
 		enum lru_list l;
@@ -2144,11 +2143,14 @@ static void shrink_all_zones(unsigned lo
 						l == LRU_ACTIVE_FILE))
 				continue;
 
-			zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan += (lru_pages >> prio) + 1;
-			if (zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan >= nr_pages || pass > 3) {
+			reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
+			reclaim_stat->nr_saved_scan[l] +=
+						(lru_pages >> prio) + 1;
+			if (reclaim_stat->nr_saved_scan[l]
+						>= nr_pages || pass > 3) {
 				unsigned long nr_to_scan;
 
-				zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan = 0;
+				reclaim_stat->nr_saved_scan[l] = 0;
 				nr_to_scan = min(nr_pages, lru_pages);
 				nr_reclaimed += shrink_list(l, nr_to_scan, zone,
 								sc, prio);
--- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c	2009-08-21 15:02:50.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c	2009-08-21 15:03:25.000000000 +0800
@@ -3734,7 +3734,7 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_
 		zone_pcp_init(zone);
 		for_each_lru(l) {
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->lru[l].list);
-			zone->lru[l].nr_saved_scan = 0;
+			zone->reclaim_stat.nr_saved_scan[l] = 0;
 		}
 		zone->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[0] = 0;
 		zone->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[1] = 0;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-21 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-20  2:49 [PATCH] " Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20  2:52 ` [PATCH] mm: make nr_scan_try_batch() more safe on races Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20  3:17   ` [RFC][PATCH] mm: remove unnecessary loop inside shrink_inactive_list() Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 11:09     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-21 11:22       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-27  0:20         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-20  3:13 ` [PATCH] mm: do batched scans for mem_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20  4:05   ` [PATCH -v2] " Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20  4:06     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20  5:16     ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-21  1:39       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21  1:46         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 11:01     ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-20 11:49       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 12:13         ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-20 12:32           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21  3:55     ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-21  7:27       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-08-21 10:57         ` [PATCH -v2 changelog updated] " KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090821072743.GA1808@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=jeffrey.g.dike@intel.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox