From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC316B004D for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:09:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d28relay01.in.ibm.com (d28relay01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.58]) by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7KJ9i7b010811 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:39:44 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay01.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n7KJ9iqZ2359348 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:39:44 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n7KJ9h7U010467 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:39:44 +0530 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:39:42 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Scalability fixes -- 2.6.31 candidate? Message-ID: <20090820190941.GA29572@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , prarit@redhat.com, andi.kleen@intel.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Daisuke Miyakawa , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar List-ID: Hi, Andrew, I've been wondering if the scalability fixes for root overhead in memory cgroup is a candidate for 2.6.31? They don't change functionality but help immensely using existing accounting features. Opening up the email for more debate and discussion and thoughts. -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org