From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BEC6B004F for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:10:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:10:01 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] [11/19] HWPOISON: Refactor truncate to allow direct truncating of page v2 Message-ID: <20090805141001.GJ11385@basil.fritz.box> References: <200908051136.682859934@firstfloor.org> <20090805093638.D3754B15D8@basil.firstfloor.org> <20090805102008.GB17190@wotan.suse.de> <20090805134607.GH11385@basil.fritz.box> <20090805140145.GB28563@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090805140145.GB28563@wotan.suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: Andi Kleen , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com List-ID: > I haven't brought up the caller at this point, but IIRC you had > the page locked and mapping confirmed at this point anyway so > it would never be an error for your code. > > Probably it would be nice to just force callers to verify the page. > Normally IMO it is much nicer and clearer to do it at the time the > page gets locked, unless there is good reason otherwise. Ok. I think I'll just keep it as it is for now. The only reason I added the error code was to make truncate_inode_page fit into .error_remove_page, but then latter I did another wrapper so it could be removed again. But it won't hurt to have it either. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org