Re: [patch -mm v2] mm: introduce oom_adj_child

[KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>]

> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 
> > Summarizing I think now .....
> >   - rename mm->oom_adj as mm->effective_oom_adj
> >   - re-add per-thread oom_adj
> >   - update mm->effective_oom_adj based on per-thread oom_adj
> >   - if necessary, plz add read-only /proc/pid/effective_oom_adj file.
> >     or show 2 values in /proc/pid/oom_adj
> >   - rewrite documentation about oom_score.
> >    " it's calclulated from  _process's_ memory usage and oom_adj of
> >     all threads which shares a memor  context".
> >    This behavior is not changed from old implemtation, anyway.
> >  - If necessary, rewrite oom_kill itself to scan only thread group
> >    leader. It's a way to go regardless of  vfork problem.
> > 
> 
> Ok, so you've abandoned the signal_struct proposal and now want to add it 
> back to task_struct with an effective member in mm_struct by changing the 
> documentation.  Hmm.

Oops, please see From line. The page was made from me ;)


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>