From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B0B6B0055 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:05:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:05:02 +0200 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Message-ID: <20090720080502.GG7298@wotan.suse.de> References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <20090715135620.GD7298@wotan.suse.de> <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Linux Memory Management , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hugh Dickins , Linus Torvalds List-ID: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 05:11:13PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:56 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > I would like to merge the new support that depends on this in 2.6.32, > > > so unless there's major objections, I'd like this to go in early during > > > the merge window. We can sort out separately how to carry the patch > > > around in -next until then since the powerpc tree will have a dependency > > > on it. > > > > Can't see any problem with that. > > CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so > far nobody objected to the patch itself) > > IE. The patch affects all archs, though it's a trivial change every > time, but I'll have stuff in powerpc-next that depends on it, and so I'm > not sure what the right approach is here. Should I put it in the powerpc > tree ? > > I also didn't have any formal Ack from anybody, neither mm folks nor > arch maintainers :-) Yeah, if you think it helps, Acked-by: Nick Piggin is fine ;) Unless anybody has other preferences, just send it straight to Linus in the next merge window -- if any conflicts did come up anyway they would be trivial. You could just check against linux-next before doing so, and should see if it is going to cause problems for any arch pull... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org