From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] throttle direct reclaim when too many pages are isolated already
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:19:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090716121956.fc50949f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090715223854.7548740a@bree.surriel.com>
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:38:53 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> When way too many processes go into direct reclaim, it is possible
> for all of the pages to be taken off the LRU. One result of this
> is that the next process in the page reclaim code thinks there are
> no reclaimable pages left and triggers an out of memory kill.
>
> One solution to this problem is to never let so many processes into
> the page reclaim path that the entire LRU is emptied. Limiting the
> system to only having half of each inactive list isolated for
> reclaim should be safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> ---
> This patch goes on top of Kosaki's "Account the number of isolated pages"
> patch series.
>
> mm/vmscan.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> Index: mmotm/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2009-07-08 21:37:01.000000000 -0400
> +++ mmotm/mm/vmscan.c 2009-07-08 21:39:02.000000000 -0400
> @@ -1035,6 +1035,27 @@ int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Are there way too many processes in the direct reclaim path already?
> + */
> +static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file)
> +{
> + unsigned long inactive, isolated;
> +
> + if (current_is_kswapd())
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (file) {
> + inactive = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> + isolated = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE);
> + } else {
> + inactive = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> + isolated = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> + }
> +
> + return isolated > inactive;
> +}
Why this means "too much" ?
And, could you put this check under scanning_global_lru(sc) ?
Thanks,
-Kame
> +
> +/*
> * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone(). It returns the number
> * of reclaimed pages
> */
> @@ -1049,6 +1070,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
> struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
> int lumpy_reclaim = 0;
>
> + while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(zone, file))) {
> + schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ/10);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * If we need a large contiguous chunk of memory, or have
> * trouble getting a small set of contiguous pages, we
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-16 2:38 Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 2:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16 3:10 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16 3:28 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 3:38 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16 3:42 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 3:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16 3:53 ` [PATCH -mm] throttle direct reclaim when too many pages are isolated already (v3) Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 4:02 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16 4:09 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 4:26 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-29 15:04 ` Pavel Machek
2009-07-29 16:19 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 3:36 ` [PATCH -mm] throttle direct reclaim when too many pages are isolated already (v2) Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 3:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-07-16 3:32 ` [PATCH -mm] throttle direct reclaim when too many pages are isolated already Rik van Riel
2009-07-16 3:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-16 3:47 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090716121956.fc50949f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox