From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C11906B004F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:51:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n6F5SLpC016159 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:28:21 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5369045DE51 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:28:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304D845DE4F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:28:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08190E08003 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:28:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from m108.s.css.fujitsu.com (m108.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.108]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56C41DB803B for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:28:20 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v9) In-Reply-To: <20090715040811.GF24034@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090710125950.5610.99139.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <20090715040811.GF24034@balbir.in.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20090715142736.39AA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:28:19 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > * Balbir Singh [2009-07-10 18:29:50]: > > > > > From: Balbir Singh > > > > New Feature: Soft limits for memory resource controller. > > > > Here is v9 of the new soft limit implementation. Soft limits is a new feature > > for the memory resource controller, something similar has existed in the > > group scheduler in the form of shares. The CPU controllers interpretation > > of shares is very different though. > > > > If there are no objections to these patches, could we pick them up for > testing in mmotm. Sorry, I haven't review this patch series. please give me few days. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org